[VOA]

“
Mr. Otis McDonald. A living example of how you can’t judge a book by its cover.
“

I heard him in a short interview with National Public Radio (I listen
to NPR for “oppossition research”).
He sounded like he probably leans a bit left of center...but he’s
clear on the right to own a weapon. He said he must have one because
his neighborhood is in long, steady decline.
All in all, he sounded like a good guy.

[MHGinTN]

I have been devoting a lot of time of late on thoughts for home defense, and settled upon two excellent options: an inexpensive single-shot .410 shotgun and/or a 9mm carbine, like the Hi-Point or the KelTecSub2000. The idea is to have ammo and weapon stored separately if there are still children in the home, but retain the ability to quickly bring the weapon to loaded and ready to fire.

I've attached a foregrip and laser and devised a way to keep the .410 ammo (which comes in a variety of shells, even slugs) at the ready to be stapped onto the side of the stock of the gun where it is easily used for reloading. The 9MM carbine is easier because it can be brought to ready with a detachable magazine of high capacity such as twenty or thrity rounds for rapid shooting, of course using a laser to assist in target acquisition.

Both methods for defense can be fired effectively 'from the hip' since the laser dot is the aim point. Shooting 'from the hip' also allows the inexperience shooter to see the entire field in front, to take into account little ones in a panic.

If the federal oligarchy removes the Constitutional right to bear arms in defense, they should be swiftly 'attacked'. Our society grows more lawless each deacde, as liberals coddle criminals and sweep aside victims of criminals while stretching 'rights' ever higher for the criminal element ... in order to make the populace more dependent upon the federal oligarchs of course. We the people need to stop this trend and reverse it NOW.