Posted on 03/20/2010 7:07:53 AM PDT by SE Mom
Edited on 03/21/2010 5:00:38 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
why doesnt someone just ask whatever the republican was trying to ask..we got the shaft on that..but it sounds like something that someone should ask.
Would the gentleman from Rhode Island assume that the government would pay for his automated wheelchair?
He’s angry because he doesn’t know the answer to the question.
Well, lookie here... "drink" and "crap" in the same sentence!
which is?
No. It's not worth it.
I bet Weezy and her Rules Committee did NOT remove the earmarks and special deals at all. She knows it. She just out and out lied to the House and the GOP.
That’s why they didn’t know how to handle the GOPs parliamentary inquiry - the bill did not have to go back to the Senate because the bill still contains every stinking earmark and special deal
BTW - the 13th time the house is called to order.
Yes, hostile is the exact word for Jesse Junior’s attitude.
He’s clueless. This *is* legislation geared for blacks and illegals.
How can these idiots say that Americans will wake up tomorrow knowing they will have coverage and can go to the doctor. Don’t the “benefits” kick in in 2013?!
OMG, now a moron from RI opens his mouth — keep going putz, we didn’t know how stupid you were until now...
I’m good...sipping my espresso and putting all chocolate out of my mind. ;)
It is their soul to lose, but they have no right to put other souls at risk. And they have no right to use the force of government to seize money from anyone to aid and abet the Holocaust of abortion.
"entitlements are the modern day slavery. Oppression though entitlements is by far the greatest disservice we've put upon this great nation, yet. Our freedom loving people deserve to rise up and be proud of depending not on their Government, but upon themselves!"
give ‘em hell protesters!
>>”you are allowed/encouraged to pray to saints.”
>
>I’m not getting into a flame war..but come on now...Have you never asked “others” to pray for you?
There is a BIG difference in “praying to” & “praying for.”
Consider these two sentences:
a) “As a Christian I pray for Caesar.”
b) “As a Christian I pray to Caesar.”
The second one is a contradiction because Jews [and by extension Christians] are not to pray to any God other than “the god of Abraham, Issac, & Jacob”. This is where we get into the Trinity; in the first chapter of john we see Jesus as being God’s Word [and also being God], later [Philippians 2:6-8] we see that Jesus who was God and had every right to grasp co-equality instead took the ultimate path of humility and obedience.
James 5:16 even exhorts us to pray FOR one another; yet, one of my favorite bible-stories [Daniel & the Lion’s Den — http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Dan%206:1-28&version=KJV ] is involving praying TO somebody [other than the King].
So, yes, I challenge you to prove that there is NO [or even little] difference in “praying to” and “praying for.”
Oh boy... a new sob story.
Shep Smith being himself. Back to NASCAR.
The Republican after Dreir did ask, but the answer was not proper.
The answer was that he would not “rule” on the member’s “interpretation” of the senate bill according to the question.
I swear if I hear one more stupid sob story from this bunch...
A parliamentary inquiry
2.5 mins Gop
2.25 mind Dems
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.