Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NLPC Complaint Alleges Rep. Gregory Meeks Got Sweetheart Deal on Home (26p complaint-pdf)
NLPC ^ | March 21, 2010 | Ken Boehm

Posted on 03/21/2010 8:04:51 AM PDT by jazusamo

On Friday, NLPC asked the House Ethics Committee to investigate Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) for paying $830,000 for a newly-built home in 2006 that was worth more than $1.2 million. The home was built by Robert Gaskin, a contractor who does work on numerous projects for which Meeks has secured taxpayer funds. Click here to download a 26-page pdf of the Complaint.

Classified a “mansion” by the City of New York, the Queens home has about 6,000 square feet, meaning that Meeks paid $138 per square feet. That price is less than half the cost per square foot for homes in Queens in both 2006 and 2007 according to the Trulia Real Estate Search service.

The $138 per square foot paid by Meeks is even less than the cost per square foot for public housing, $165 to $265. Purchasing a mansion for less per square foot than public housing is certainly a spectacular deal.

According to the Complaint:

Another indication that the Meeks home was a bargain comes from 2007/2008 Assessment Year Cost Guidelines, a publication of the New York City Department of Finance, Property Division Valuation Policy and Quality Control Unit. This cost guideline publication lists the cost per square foot for “High Value Residences (Mansion Style)” at $355 to $540.  Taking the lowest end of that range, $355 per square foot and multiplying it times 6,000 square feet puts the cost of a 6,000-square-foot mansion at $2,130,000, a staggering $1,300,000 over Meeks’ purchase price of $830,000.

The Complaint also asks for an investigation into Meeks’ relationship with indicted Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford. The Miami Herald reported in December that former Stanford employees alleged that Stanford asked Meeks in 2006 to help retaliate against a former Stanford executive named Gonzalo Tirado in Venezuela who was attempting to blow the whistle on Stanford fraud. Stanford allegedly asked Meeks to contact Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez. One month after Stanford made the request, Meeks flew to Venezuela to meet with Chavez. Stanford wanted Chavez to go after whistleblower Tirado, who was indicted a year later.

From the Complaint:

The issue isn’t whether Meeks received a sweetheart deal. He did.

The real focus of any investigation should be why Meeks received such a lucrative deal and who was Meeks’ beneficiary for the bargain mansion.

Related:

High-Living Congressman Meeks Blames NLPC for Scrutiny

Doubts Cast on Rep. Meeks’ New Account of Missing Katrina Funds

Rep. Gregory Meeks Blasted Bush Response to Hurricane Katrina

Why Haven’t Obama, Pelosi Jettisoned Rep. Gregory Meeks?

Rep. Meeks Can’t Account for Hurricane Katrina Money; Puts Spotlight on Paterson/Flake Aqueduct Gambling Deal

Are Corrupt NY Politicians Cashing in on Aqueduct Gambling?

Rep. Gregory Meeks’ Charity Looks More Like Slush Fund



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; congress; cultureofcorruption; democrats; ethics; ethicscommittee; gregorymeeks; meeks; nlpc

1 posted on 03/21/2010 8:04:51 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This should be standard proceedure for ALL Dums that vote for this HCR Bill.
As one Congresscritter (Hastings ?) said there are no rules, we are making them up as we go along.


2 posted on 03/21/2010 8:13:15 AM PDT by Marty62 ( Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The American people must investigate the dirt behind each and every one of these members of Congress. Corruption and power grabs smell up our government. It’s time for these crooks to do jail time.


3 posted on 03/21/2010 8:13:31 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; Marty62

It’s way past time Pelosi fulfills her promise to “drain the swamp” but I doubt she has the time to do it even if she wanted to.


4 posted on 03/21/2010 8:17:47 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pelosi is the swamp queen. Dig her dirt and ship her out.


5 posted on 03/21/2010 8:18:51 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I am shocked! A NY Congressman getting a “sweetheart deal”? Who would ever believe that?


6 posted on 03/21/2010 8:24:06 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

When we take the congress in January, I hope they do nothing but put people and organizations in jail for the next two years. Just a thought


7 posted on 03/21/2010 8:30:52 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Also see:

Hide and Meeks--Shady charities, odd financial disclosure, junkets dog congessman

8 posted on 03/21/2010 8:31:05 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Another loser, crooked member of the Democrat Congressional Black Caucus.

Color me surprised.


9 posted on 03/21/2010 8:33:51 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Alfred E. Neuman for President! Oh, wait a minute ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

10 posted on 03/21/2010 8:34:32 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

You mentioned Hastings. He was impeached and removed from the Federal Bench for Bribery and Perjury and then ran and got elected to Congress. Go figure!


11 posted on 03/21/2010 8:41:11 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; SE Mom; onyx; Miss Didi; maggief

More democrat corruption news going unreported ping!


12 posted on 03/21/2010 8:58:13 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

I’m going to be posting swear words by day’s end.
This sanctimonious bustard goes onto the various news shows like he’s squeaky clean.


13 posted on 03/21/2010 9:05:16 AM PDT by onyx (God save our Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
The American people must investigate the dirt behind each and every one of these members of Congress. Corruption and power grabs smell up our government...

THAT'S what National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) does! Their theme is Promoting Ethics in Public Life !
14 posted on 03/21/2010 9:07:43 AM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow; kristinn; Bahbah; Fudd Fan; HonestConservative; sneakers

ping


15 posted on 03/21/2010 9:08:44 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray, Pray, Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Didn’t they prosecute Sen. Stevens for something like that? Betcha Meeks skates.


16 posted on 03/21/2010 9:15:29 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Yes, they prosecuted Stevens on a similar thing but this looks to be a much bigger scam on Meek’s part than was Stevens.

For Meeks to buy a new 6000’ plus house for $830,000 in NY is beyond belief and there’s a lot more in this ethics complaint.


17 posted on 03/21/2010 9:28:08 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
For Meeks to buy a new 6000’ plus house for $830,000 in NY is beyond belief and there’s a lot more in this ethics complaint.

This might help you believe it. On the right of the large photo is what appears to be the church mentioned in the ethics complaint from which the lot originated.

194-24 109th Rd, Queens, New York 11412

18 posted on 03/21/2010 9:39:27 AM PDT by doc11355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doc11355

Thanks for the pic. I’d say you’re right about that church and that’s quite a pad of Meeks.


19 posted on 03/21/2010 9:45:01 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson