Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pantera

Unfortunately, I’m afraid the courts will judge that to be a slippery slope. They won’t strike down 90 years of law.


8 posted on 03/21/2010 7:26:10 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee

Bump


9 posted on 03/21/2010 9:53:18 PM PDT by Pantera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dr_who

I agree we must anticipate that the court will uphold their appointers unrestricted power. We must therefore ignore them and protect our rights with active and determined nullification and interposition.

we must enforce the State laws against theses things with vigor.

The States can not be “co-equal” governments as defined by the Founders in the sell of the Constitution, if they are to be judge inferior to the Federal government in All respects in which the Federal Government itself chooses to engage in.

Our Constitution is at threat here, the court can choose to refuses to uphold it’s oath all its like and simply place itself in league with the tyrants that now control the Whitehorse and Congress.
Ask them who are responsibility

How is it possible that liberty can survive when the congress and president can do such things of practically unlimited authority in total disregard to the spelled out limits of our constitution, in addition to the will of the people?

How is it that we can even call ourselves a republic of Constitutional law if this cannot be stopped?


11 posted on 03/21/2010 10:17:33 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson