“Why, because you have the monopoly on the truth of the matter? Really LOL, now.”
No, in my country they are called “facts.”
“So now you are backing off the genocide claim because Sherman botched the job with poor execution?”
No, I’m continuing to make your argument look as stupid as it is.
No, I’m continuing to make your argument look as stupid as it is.
<><><><><
You’ve done a pretty lousy job of it, given that you have provided not a single shred of documentation that the genocide you speak of ever actually happened. In fact, you’ve pretty much backed off the idea of genocide, hiding behind ‘he woulda been genocidal but he was incompetent in being genocidal’.
What Sherman said more than a month before the march is interesting historically, but his actions, what he did in the field is also important. In this case, considerably more important.
And you have completely failed to make the case for genocide.
No, in my country they are called “facts.”
<><><><><<>
Sooooo, Sherman writing about what he was going to do 5 weeks before the march constitutes facts about the march? In spite of the fact that what he wrote did not happen?
Wow. Your threshold for facts is a bit different than what I’m used to.