Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney Endorses Trey Grayson
Trey Grayson for Senate ^ | 03/24/2010 | Nate Hodson

Posted on 03/24/2010 7:44:23 AM PDT by speciallybland

Florence, Kentucky – Former Vice President Dick Cheney announced today that he is endorsing Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at treygrayson.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 2010endorsements; 2010midterms; cheney; dickcheney; gopprimary; kentucky; ky2010; palinsupports; randpaul; strongonborders; treygrayson; vanjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: SoCalPol
The term Neocon is a pejorative to those who think we should surrender to the IslamOfascists so they can kill we the infidels

No it isn't. It's discussed in great detail in this book:


(Click here for more info)

41 posted on 03/24/2010 12:27:46 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

You obviously didn’t understand my reference.
There are people who:
understand what NeoCon means and supports
a free country not overrun and attacked by the enemy.

Then there are the PaulBots who think NeoCons are out to take over the world. It is their way to keep their
lemmings tied to the anti war message.

I have Known who Irving Kristol is for decades.
I have 3 of his wife’s (Gertrude Himmelfarb’s )books

“The De-Moralization of Society” “On Looking Into the Abyss” & “The New History and the Old, Critical Essays and Reappraisals”


42 posted on 03/24/2010 12:46:17 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Maybe if you looked at where we have come since we rejected isolationist policies and decided we could remake the world in our image you might not be so lost.


43 posted on 03/24/2010 12:52:45 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
"Maybe if you looked at where we have come since we rejected isolationist policies and decided we could remake the world in our image you might not be so lost."

How quickly we forget

Comments like yours prove that there are far too many people in this country that still don't comprehend the lethality of our opponents, the resiliency of the organizations or their motivations for their hatred.

I hope the country can survive the struggle within, to have the courage to crush the enemy outside. Just saying.

44 posted on 03/24/2010 1:00:24 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (USA - b. July 4, 1776 / d. March 21, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
You're completely full of BS when referring to Rep. Paul.

The Neocons aren't true conservatives. They are PROGRESSIVE in that they think that gov't should be big enough to help what they think the free markets won't. They also refute the foreign policy of the Founding Fathers & believe that its the business of the US to "spread democracy" throughout the globe, as opposed to minding our own business & remaining super-strong militarily in case someone tries to mess w/ US.

If we had the foreign policy that the Founders thought we should have, we wouldn't be trying to create a world in our own image by throwing foreign aid $ to any place that we think it's necessary (not to forget the fact that foreign aid is UNCONSTITUTIONAL). Arming the guerrillas (sp?) in Afghanistan in the 1980's to fight the commies then being surprised when they bite us in the arse on Sept. 11 is an excellent example of this.

Neocons do NOT support a free country w/ limited government & a respect for state's rights. Far from it! They are big government traitors just like the democrats, ableit for different rerasons & on different issues.

45 posted on 03/24/2010 1:06:02 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

I worked for Reagan when he first ran for governor.
I know what a conservative is and Ron Paul is an anti war Neo Leftist who states Iran and North Korea are not a threat, leave them alone.
His rants on youtube against Israel sound like his his Neo Nazi friends Alex Jones and Lew Rockwell wrote them.

When the Founding Father wrote their views, the enemy took weeks in their man of war ships to come to America.

NOW

The enemy can send Nuclear missiles in 30 minutes can hit and destroy cities all over the U.S.


46 posted on 03/24/2010 1:24:35 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Oh yes!

Thank you for the alerting me to the good news!


47 posted on 03/24/2010 1:43:36 PM PDT by onyx (God save our Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
I worked for Reagan when he first ran for governor.

Good for you. Rep. Paul worked for Reagan while he was PRESIDENT:



When the Founding Father wrote their views, the enemy took weeks in their man of war ships to come to America.

NOW

The enemy can send Nuclear missiles in 30 minutes can hit and destroy cities all over the U.S.

Don't give me that "times have changed...things are different now" excuse. The principles of the Founders still hold true today, do they not? You sound just like the Progressives when you make statements like that.

But just im case the Founders werre wrong & that things need to be "modernized" for our times, then please, AMEND THE CONSTITUTION so the fedgov will have the power to be the official Policeman of the World (POTW). I'm sure you could do that quite easily, considering the foreign policy views of the DC & NY Establishment running our foreign policy. You can change our national motto to "Policemen Of The World, Unite!".

48 posted on 03/24/2010 1:44:33 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Palin donated to Paul but she never really endorsed

Why are you repeating that? I thought that I already cleared that up for you.

To: PhiKapMom
I think she gave money but I don’t remember an endorsement.

Governor Palin gave a formal endorsement for Rand Paul, as has, Concerned Women for America, Gun Owners of America, Steve Forbes and RedState.com.

Asked by "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace why she endorsed Paul, Palin said “Because he's a federalist and he wants the states to have more say and as we respect the 10th Amendment in our Constitution, he wants the states to have more say in a lot of these issues."
86 posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 7:36:59 PM by ansel12

49 posted on 03/24/2010 1:46:31 PM PDT by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

And Paul said about Reagan “Paul criticized Ronald Reagan as a failure”

Ron Paul is a POS


50 posted on 03/24/2010 1:51:15 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

Showing a decades old photo for a sitting politician currently in office, is not much of a defense of his reputation today.


51 posted on 03/24/2010 1:52:19 PM PDT by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
Ron Paul is a POS

Is that the best you can do (get vulgar & insult someone you disagree with)? You do yourself & your opinions no favors by having such an attitude.

You're not Bill Maher in drag, are you? I'm just askin', 'cuz statements such as the one you made above sounds a lot like something that today's angry progressives would say.

52 posted on 03/24/2010 2:07:01 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Showing a decades old photo for a sitting politician currently in office, is not much of a defense of his reputation today.

Maybe not, but it is proof that Reagan's friendship w/ Rep. Paul was a good one, & that they held ea other in high regard. I doubt if Paul's opinions has changed a whole lot since the 70s.

53 posted on 03/24/2010 2:27:30 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
Did you ever wonder why anyone would nuke all of most of our cities? This would be immensely stupid and would kill or sicken not only most of us but much of the world. It's not only stupid, heck it's insane beyond belief.

They want to destroy us from within and they are making progress, too. Those who are called neocons are a foreign breed, I mean foreign to what our republic was meant to be. I'm afraid these otherwise respectable people like Cheney, if he is neocon, are too closely aligned with the NWO. It was after 9-11 that for the first time I saw our president speaking to a group at the Council on Foreign Relations. (GWB '01 or '02). Every president since Wilson --except Reagan--has been a member of the CFR. Reagan was the lone 'outsider', and the CFR-NWO types failed in their attempts to stop him, because he was acclaimed by the people. Even Dems voted for him. So they went to work doing everything possible behind the scenes to prevent another 'of his kind' to gain any ground.

One question: Are Ron Paul and his son Rand members of the CFR?

54 posted on 03/24/2010 2:40:38 PM PDT by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum; SoCalPol

Excellent b*tch slap, Mo!


55 posted on 03/24/2010 3:00:15 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR
Maybe not, but it is proof that Reagan's friendship w/ Rep. Paul was a good one, & that they held ea other in high regard.

No it doesn't, there are generations of politicians that can roll out a Reagan photo. The Romney family can do that too.

I think that after decades of being a career politician while never being able to rise out of his safe congressional district, in other words, failing to get people outside of that district to elect him to anything, that we have learned a lot about the guy that wasn't known a quarter century ago.

The guy gives me the creeps, he seems as shady as anyone in the business as he burns through the tens of millions of dollars of donations in living his political lifestyle as a "perennial candidate".

56 posted on 03/24/2010 3:24:48 PM PDT by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
Then there are the PaulBots who think NeoCons are out to take over the world. It is their way to keep their lemmings tied to the anti war message.

Exactly. The Paulbot DeceptiCons call everyone who is not a member of their cult "neocon."

They're a strange little cult with their identical arguments, their matching Star Trek shirts and abilities to sling insults, but not much else.

They do not support the conservative platform; they support a bizarre form of libertarianism that is quite divorced from reality, particularly when it comes to foreign policy and national security.

They go on the Alex Jones show and giggle about the latest moonbat conspiracies. They march with Code Pink and A.N.S.W.E.R. Paulbots all believe they are far more intelligent than anyone else, when the opposite is in evidence. Anyone who can be duped into going lockstep with a cult doesn't have much in the way of initiative or conviction.

They all lamely post those old pictures of their cult leader with Ronald Reagan as proof of...something.

I had my picture taken with Newt Gingrich and Arnold Schwarzenegger at the Republican Convention in '92. That doesn't mean I support them. I don't. A picture taken with a politician means nothing.

With the problems our country and our very freedom is facing today, these Paultard libertarians are poisonous.

57 posted on 03/24/2010 3:47:39 PM PDT by Allegra (SEIU delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

Some people love anybody with that ‘R’ by their name! Then you point out the CFR and get ‘crickets’!


58 posted on 03/24/2010 4:57:27 PM PDT by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland; fieldmarshaldj; onyx

Are you the chairman of n00bs for Paul?


59 posted on 03/24/2010 5:06:22 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

So, another Peter Pan with his head in the sand.
Your Left Wing mind set keeps you safe from the Conservtives who face reality.


60 posted on 03/24/2010 5:08:21 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson