Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breakthrough Is Reported in U.S. Arms Pact With Russia (Agreement to slash nuclear arsenals)
New York Times ^ | 03/24/2010 | Peter Baker and Ellen Barry

Posted on 03/24/2010 11:58:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

WASHINGTON — President Obama and his Russian counterpart, President Dmitri A. Medvedev, have broken through a logjam in their arms control negotiations and expect to sign a new treaty in Prague next month that would slash American and Russian nuclear arsenals, officials from both nations said Wednesday.

Mr. Obama and Mr. Medvedev still need to talk once more to finalize the agreement, but officials were optimistic that the deal was nearly done.

The two sides have discussed a signing ceremony in Prague in early April, marking the anniversary of the first meeting between the two presidents and of Mr. Obama’s speech outlining his vision for eventually eliminating nuclear weapons.

The new pact would replace the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty of 1991, which expired in December, and would require both sides to reduce their warheads and launchers by more than one-quarter. The agreement is the most significant accomplishment so far for Mr. Obama’s policy of trying to “reset” relations with Russia. It is intended to pave the way for another more far-reaching round of reductions later in his term.

Neither the White House nor the Kremlin would formally comment on Wednesday, but officials on both sides confirmed that an agreement was close to done. A Kremlin official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said there was basic agreement on the text of the pact, although not all the wording had been finalized. He confirmed that Prague would be the likely location of a signing ceremony, although that too needed to be finalized.

Mr. Obama met at the White House on Wednesday morning with Senators John F. Kerry of Massachusetts and Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, the senior Democrat and Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to brief them on the status of the treaty.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armspact; nuclearweapons; russia; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2010 11:58:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The treaty would require each side to reduce deployed strategic nuclear warheads to roughly 1,600, down from 2,200 now, officials have said. It would also oblige each side to reduce its arsenal of strategic bombers and land- and sea-based missiles to 800, half the old limit of 1,600.

Arms control advocates consider those reductions to be relatively modest. But Mr. Obama wanted to negotiate a relatively straightforward replacement for the Start treaty as a way to rebuild trust with Moscow, leading to more ambitious agreements down the road.


2 posted on 03/24/2010 11:59:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Breaking News: Neville Obama surrenders to Russia. Claims we’ll have “Peace in our time.”


3 posted on 03/24/2010 12:00:23 PM PDT by brownsfan (The average American: Uninformed, and unconcerned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And why do we want to “build trust” with Moscow?


4 posted on 03/24/2010 12:00:38 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Both parties are moving us toward zero nukes.

Bush slashed warheads from 6500 to around 2200.

Both parties suck big time.


5 posted on 03/24/2010 12:01:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Novemberrrrrr.... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2477039/posts?page=16#16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Breaking News: Neville Obama surrenders to Russia. Claims we’ll have “Peace in our time.”

At least today Russia is somewhat of a Christian country.

6 posted on 03/24/2010 12:02:10 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'll bet Obama's plan is to trust his Russian camrades.

No need for verification of course.

7 posted on 03/24/2010 12:02:51 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Somehow I get the feeling that we’ll be the ones doing the slashing while the Ruskies do a build up.....


8 posted on 03/24/2010 12:03:23 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah. So we’ll destroy our nuclear arsenal and Russia will agree to .....watch.


9 posted on 03/24/2010 12:04:24 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When have arms controls ever worked? My guess is slightly less than never.


10 posted on 03/24/2010 12:04:30 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama”You first.” Putin “ No you first.”
I went first last time. You first..... Obama "Ok I'll go first." Putin "Sucker."
11 posted on 03/24/2010 12:04:46 PM PDT by lucky american (If you think the Libs care about your health.....LOLOLOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
And why do we want to “build trust” with Moscow?

Because they have been so helpful with Iran sanctions, of course.

12 posted on 03/24/2010 12:05:09 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe (How can you tell when the President is lying? When his lips move, of course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

“When have arms controls ever worked? My guess is slightly less than never”

To be clear, I don’t mean when have both sides stuck to the agreement, which probably comes in at nearly almost never. I mean when did the deals actually change anything? When did they make the world more peaceful? Because, let me tell you, if you go through with what you agreed to, it meant you were predisposed to do so. Which means ostensibly the agreeement accomplished nothing. No one ever agreed to and followed through on a deal they didn’t want to, without a gun to their head.


13 posted on 03/24/2010 12:07:48 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

Obama’s “negotiating” tactic seems to be give concessions first, and then hope for results after the concessions.

He’s a very foolish and dangerous man.


14 posted on 03/24/2010 12:08:02 PM PDT by Carling (I'm a neo-McCarthyite ... Obama is a Communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

They may be our allies in a war with either China, or possibly a coalition of Muslim states.

We dont need to be buddies, but its stupid to be total enemies.


15 posted on 03/24/2010 12:10:30 PM PDT by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Sounds like making way for the Duterman Prophecy to come true where China nukes the west coast and Russia nukes the east coast and the roads form the south are filled with looters.
16 posted on 03/24/2010 12:10:46 PM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Remember that as far as the US administration (and in particular the DOS) is concerned, pursuant to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (which we never ratified), merely signing a treaty requires the signatory nation to abide by the spirit of the agreement pending ratification as a matter of "customary international law." That is why Bush "unsigned" the ICC treaty.

Hence, this administration will make every attempt to preclude the public from learning the terms of this agreement before a signature is applied.

Sucks, doesn't it?

17 posted on 03/24/2010 12:12:09 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Situational federalism is the same problem as selective incorporation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

.
It just keeps getting worse.


18 posted on 03/24/2010 12:14:06 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Thats an interesting observation...

In the meanwhile.... Obama continues his muslim outreach and is giving them ALL kinds of technologies and allows Iran to continue their good research for their inalienable right to nuclear power.

It will be only a couple of weeks when they will have al quaeda visit us to demonstrate their newly fresh packaged nuclear suitcase nukes.

Obama is right on his game!


19 posted on 03/24/2010 12:15:26 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Breakthrough Is Reported in U.S. Arms Pact With Russia (Agreement for U.S.A. to slash nuclear arsenals)
Isn’t that the way its supposed to read?


20 posted on 03/24/2010 12:15:44 PM PDT by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson