Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From a Doctor Who Will Not Comply
NR ^ | Daniel Foster

Posted on 03/24/2010 5:42:07 PM PDT by Sir Gawain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: kittykat77

This is a conservative forum. This physician has every right to practice her profession in the manner she see fit.


41 posted on 03/24/2010 7:08:10 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

“MRI, Radiology, etc., where records will be kept and sent to the government.”
What I’ve read so far of the bill, you are correct.
Currently, you enter into a hospital and designate how you are going to pay (insurance information or self-pay, etc.), that information will go into their electronic system. The hospitals I’ve worked in do not have the option to exclude you or your information from their system because they are in receipt of government funds in the form of CMS patients and thus because the government already essentially controls the functioning of the hospitals that accept their patients, they also control many if not all of the regulations within a hospital. The hospitals can refuse to comply (won’t happen) with CMS regulations but they will be “decertified” and will not be paid for CMS patients. CMS patients account for a significant amount of revenue for many hospitals.
Hospitals do have programs in which your name can be changed so nosy prying eyes can’t identify you (in the cases of extreme wealth, notoriety, fame, high profile case etc. or a victim of a crime or suspected victim), but the real id is always known on the backside.


42 posted on 03/24/2010 7:13:32 PM PDT by ebersole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

bump


43 posted on 03/24/2010 7:15:27 PM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

“This physician has every right to practice her profession in the manner she see fit.”

For however long she is allowed to practice it. Failure to adhere to the rules will eventually result in having ones medical license pulled and with it her ability to prescribe drugs.


44 posted on 03/24/2010 7:22:14 PM PDT by PLMerite (Ride to the sound of the Guns - I'll probably need help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kevao
By the way, isn’t it odd that the lawyers in Congress don’t see a need for the American people to have access to quality, affordable legal services? ...excellent point - but more than a need, it's a right - the Constitution after all is a political/legal document, so one might argue that in fact the right to free legal assistance on demand is the primary right all citizens should have in order to be able to exercise their citizenship to the fullest......
45 posted on 03/24/2010 7:59:11 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

After listening to the discussion about the process which will be used to amend the Law to include children with pre-existing before 2014, it became apparent that Ms. Sillybus has broad authority to write specific regulations - which I am sure she will change on a regular basis. Given that, I would suspect that there may be a move to deny physicians the ability to practice medicine independently, i.e., on a private pay basis. BO is really pushing the electronic medical records issue but he doesn’t have a clue how much data will be descending on those trying to manage the program. Their systems are not state of the art nor are there enough people who can manage such systems. I would suspect that all of this is several years down the road and if we can’t get Congress re-staffed before them we are in real trouble. On the other hand, I’m not sure that the Republicans we have in Congress right now have sufficient knowledge to problem solve these matters either.


46 posted on 03/24/2010 8:03:06 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
so one might argue that in fact the right to free legal assistance on demand is the primary right all citizens should have in order to be able to exercise their citizenship to the fullest

Well, then let's get to it! The "moocher" class is hungry. They're getting Obama money and free health care. And they want more!

Let someone suggest free legal services, and watch the corrupt lawyers who game the system squirm. How much you want to bet that they'd argue that a public option, access to quality, affordable legal services, would be "unconstitutional?"

47 posted on 03/24/2010 8:20:07 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tell me
She gives you medical care and you pay her, just like in the old days. Lots of doctors have already informed their patients of their new way to practice.

I understand that. I've gone to doctors who don't participate in any insurance programs. I paid by cash, check, or credit card. The doctor's office always gave me a receipt with the correct medical billing code on it so I could submit it to my insurance company for reimbursement or to credit towards my deductible. But without a medical billing code, which this doctor says she will no longer provide, most insurance companies won't accept the receipt.

Again, the doctor can run a cash-only practice. That certainly simplifies things for her. But not providing a receipt with the medical billing code on it only hurts her patients.

Or am I missing something here?

48 posted on 03/24/2010 8:43:39 PM PDT by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
just to satisfy a need to serve their patients for free.

How does providing patients who pay cash for her services with medical billing coded receipts required for insurance reimbursement EQUAL providing free medical care?

You lost me on that one.

49 posted on 03/24/2010 8:47:44 PM PDT by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

She sure does! I hope NRO interviews her 1 or 2 years from now and see how her practice is doing since she started refusing to issue the coded receipts her patients need for insurance reimbursement.

She won’t have patients with any kind of medical insurance. I don’t know who that leaves except illegal aliens and crackheads!


50 posted on 03/24/2010 8:52:16 PM PDT by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tell me
“No, she’s just doing what my husband’s doctor did in advance of this Obamanation. She’s taking her practice private. She gives you medical care and you pay her, just like in the old days. Lots of doctors have already informed their patients of their new way to practice.”

This would be fine with me.I'm sure the doctors are more than willing to work on the payment of services with each patient,just like in the old days.The beauty of these doctors decisions is that some board or panel,or bureaucrat will not be making MY decisions for me.

51 posted on 03/24/2010 10:49:12 PM PDT by hwkbeer (Socialism is like rust,it's ugly,destructive,and never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


52 posted on 03/24/2010 10:50:07 PM PDT by nutmeg (Bart Stupak: Judas, Neville Chamberlain or Benedict Arnold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittykat77

“She won’t have patients with any kind of medical insurance. I don’t know who that leaves except illegal aliens and crackheads!”

No. The illegal aliens and crackheads WILL have the government mandated health insurance. I think the whole point of this thread is for those who will rebel against the whole Nationalized Healthcare scheme will be her customers.

Just remember to pay the fine for not having health insurance. (This is all so fricken’ nuts)


53 posted on 03/24/2010 10:58:08 PM PDT by 21twelve (Having the Democrats in control is like a never-ending game of Calvin ball. (Giotto))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kittykat77
She won’t have patients with any kind of medical insurance. I don’t know who that leaves except illegal aliens and crackheads!

Actually the illegals won't go to her, they'll be getting their health care covered by the government.

Perhaps the movement isn't happening in your area but there are many folks who pay for their health care directly - not illegals and crackheads, but people who don't want the insurance company and the government telling them what tests/care they can and cannot have.

54 posted on 03/25/2010 4:50:28 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: awin
health care costs started escalating when government introduced medicare/medicaid

You're right. Look at the cost of lasik eye surgery and plastic surgery. Those prices have been dropping. No involvement of insurance or government and it's the only area of medicine where prices have dropped.

55 posted on 03/25/2010 4:55:31 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ebersole; awin
Thank you both for the tips you have suggested! I will check into those. I am new to this sort of thing. :-)
56 posted on 03/25/2010 8:18:22 AM PDT by Titan Magroyne (Freedom is taken, not given.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson