Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

What you’re saying reinforces my point that Obama’s lawyers have made no claims about Obama’s eligibility. They know better than to make a claim they can’t support. Thanks for falling on the sword yet again.


292 posted on 03/29/2010 12:17:18 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

What you’re saying reinforces my point that Obama’s lawyers have made no claims about Obama’s eligibility. They know better than to make a claim they can’t support. Thanks for falling on the sword yet again.


You’re welcome, I’m glad that I could help!
However, just so you know, the way the American system of jurisprudence works is that the plaintiff has to prove his/her case, not the defendant.
In the only actual adjudication of Obama’s status as a natural born citizen thus far, “Ankeny et. al. v Mitch Daniels, the Governor of Indiana,” Obama wasn’t named as the defendant and therefore it was the Attorney General of Indiana who made the claims of his eligibility not Obama’s lawyers. The judges of the Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with the Attorney General and they dismissed the lawsuit.
But I’m sure that hope springs eternal!


293 posted on 03/29/2010 1:05:05 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson