Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nate505

“That being said, the numbers disprove the gateway theory.”

Depends on what study you choose. As I said, fairly, there appear to be reputable studies on both sides of the issue. To pretend otherwise is dishonest.


150 posted on 03/26/2010 4:00:16 PM PDT by Persevero (Ask yourself: "What does the Left want me to do?" Then go do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero

By all means. Show me the studies that validate the gateway theory. As far as I know, they all use the “a person who has used pot is 40x (or whatever) more likely to use heroin than a person who hasn’t.” But is that what a “gateway” is? That a person who uses x was more likely to have used y than someone who didn’t use y? Or is the gateway theory more understood as a person who uses y will go on to use x. The sheer numbers disprove the latter. The former seems like common sense, but isn’t that meaningful. Like it’s any great shock that someone who uses a highly potent addicting drug that isn’t socially acceptable would not have tried or used a less potent and less addicting drug that has more social acceptance.


155 posted on 03/26/2010 7:46:49 PM PDT by Nate505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson