Instead of ‘repeal’, I would like to see the R’s run on changing the law-making process so that it slows things down. That will win more seats than repeal promises. Tell me that natural delays will be built into the process, and no more ram-this-thru/ram-that-thru will be allowed to happen.
Run on that promise, and there would be more than enough people to blow thru a veto of ‘repeal’...
Josh Marshall, the guy who runs the talking points memo website, he’s one really slimy communist.
Right on!! How about; No vote until a bill has been posted,for the public to see, in it's entirety, for thirty days? Today this means the Internet.
If there are amendments after this thirty day period, the whole process starts over.
There could be provisions for those things that are truly emergencies. Emergency would mean National Security, or natural disaster where delay would cause significant looss of life. Property would not be a consideration.
We need to forever take away the ability of law makers to make laws that redistribute wealth. We need to enshrine individual sovereignity even more so in the constitution.