Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MBB1984

The “bridge” argument falls flat because she withdrew her support for it.

If your position rests on the premise that Palin is in favor of raising taxes, you won’t get very far.

If you want to claim Palin supports amnesty, you’re the one who isn’t studying. She supports McCain’s position on border security.

You better start thinking of a new attack against her—this McCain thing is going away soon.


548 posted on 03/27/2010 9:53:48 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Show me one example where the results of Democrat policy are not the opposite of what they promise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith
She only withdrew her support for the bridge when it became despised to the national electorate. And, she did tax oil companies, which now had the result that Conoco-Phillips is moving out of Alaska, taking jobs with them.

I suppose my biggest problem with Palin, is that I believe she is a populist and a fraud. She espouses Christan beliefs, but leaves her family to work outside the home when there are small children in the home. I do not think Bristol's pregnancy and moral lapse was unrelated to her absence. She attacks others for corruption, but she herself is condemned for ethics violations by a Republican legislature. She claims to be a conservative, but places special taxes on oil companies. She supports wasteful government spending in Alaska until it becomes unpopular. She supports McCain to bed herself with the GOP establishment.

I actually hope I am wrong. Maybe she is conservative, but I have considerable doubts.

557 posted on 03/27/2010 10:51:20 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson