[TheStickman]

Dear Lord, may the Judge be correct in his assessment!

[MsLady]

Amen to that one. If Jay Sekulow takes it to the Supremes, he’s got an excellent chance of winning.

[elkfersupper]

Invoking the supreme being to intervene in the foibles of mankind is a fool’s play.

[BOBWADE]

I like the Virgina AG approach. Obamacare is all or nothing. It all stands or it is struck down if any part is unconstitutional. The AG there says that it violates state statute by requiring purchase of insurance which the state law prohibits. The feds will claim authority under the 14 amendment(interstate commerce) but the AG makes clear that there is no commerce, interstate or otherwise if a party chooses not to purchase insurance. That is where the obama’s edict fails the test. How can the law penalize individuals for failing to engage in commerce, then claim they have the authority under “interstate commerce”. It sounds like they want to claim that failing to engage in interstate commerce is within their authority when in fact there has to be interstate commerce for the 14th amendment to apply.

[gidget7]

I echo that sentiment!

[dtrpscout]

Obama’s a totalitarian national socialist, i.e., a Nazi. Let’s tell it like it is.

[Mr. Wright]

Napolitano is a very smart man . . . he know of what he speaks. I actually am of the opinion that the decision, when rendered, will be better than 5-4 — I predict a 7-2 decision in favor of the plaintiffs. I only wish the entire judicial proceedings could be fast-tracked!

[phillyfanatic]

His 2010 book on Lies the Govt. tells is very very good. But, he misses a point if he thinks SCOTUS will somehow now now make the Commerce Clause mean what it originally means. No modern Court has ever backtracked on Govt. takings and this one will not either. Yes, both the Care Bill and upcoming Cap and Trade bill are un-Const. as we have known it in the past, but not in this age as we will all pitifully feel when these guys get done with us with their legislative victories.