Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US 'may not veto UN resolution on Jerusalem'
BBC ^ | March 28, 2010 | BBC

Posted on 03/28/2010 9:31:04 AM PDT by SmartInsight

The US is considering abstaining from a possible UN Security Council resolution against Israeli settlement expansion in East Jerusalem, the BBC has learned.

The US usually blocks Security Council resolutions criticising Israel.

But relations between the allies have been severely strained by the announcement of plans to build 1,600 homes in an East Jerusalem settlement during a recent visit to Israel by US Vice-President Joe Biden.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS: antisemites; antisemitism; antisemitismat1600; dajooz; dncantisemitism; dncdrivenintifada; dncintifada; islamicsupremacists; israel; obama; obamaantisemitism; obamaintifada; un; usoutofun
I understand that the part of Jerusalem in which they are building is the part that would be part of Israel in any future "two state" solution, so why shouldn't they build there.

I hope all the Jewish voters who voted for Obama are taking note and will correct their mistake next time around.

1 posted on 03/28/2010 9:31:05 AM PDT by SmartInsight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
Are there any Western countries which are not antisemetic? If so, what are their immigration policies??

LOL

2 posted on 03/28/2010 9:34:03 AM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
I hope all the Jewish voters who voted for Obama are taking note and will correct their mistake next time around.

Even Congress is starting to notice. Three-fourths of the House signed a letter to Secretary Clinton expressing their dismay over the tone and direction of U.S.-Israeli relations.

3 posted on 03/28/2010 9:34:43 AM PDT by ContraryMary (GWB -- He kept us safe after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

The US has always been pro-Israel — until Obama got elected, who is very clearly anti-Israel. He blew this Jerusalem settlement issue out of proportion and is using it as an excuse to abandon Israel.

As I said, Jewish voters (80% voted for Obama) who voted for him are taking note.


4 posted on 03/28/2010 9:36:49 AM PDT by SmartInsight (Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote. ~ G. J. Nathan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

OBAMA THE PRESIDENT OF THE MUSLIM WORLD WILL BE TOAST IF THE USA DOES NOT SUPPORT ISRAEL IN THE UNITED NATIONS.


5 posted on 03/28/2010 9:40:34 AM PDT by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Barack Obama, the alleged president, is bringing shame - and extreme danger - on the United States.


Zechariah 2

1I lifted up mine eyes again, and looked, and behold a man with a measuring line in his hand.

2Then said I, Whither goest thou? And he said unto me, To measure Jerusalem, to see what is the breadth thereof, and what is the length thereof.

3And, behold, the angel that talked with me went forth, and another angel went out to meet him,

4And said unto him, Run, speak to this young man, saying, Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein:

5For I, saith the LORD, will be unto her a wall of fire round about, and will be the glory in the midst of her.

6Ho, ho, come forth, and flee from the land of the north, saith the LORD: for I have spread you abroad as the four winds of the heaven, saith the LORD.

7Deliver thyself, O Zion, that dwellest with the daughter of Babylon.

8For thus saith the LORD of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye.

9For, behold, I will shake mine hand upon them, and they shall be a spoil to their servants: and ye shall know that the LORD of hosts hath sent me.

10Sing and rejoice, O daughter of Zion: for, lo, I come, and I will dwell in the midst of thee, saith the LORD.

11And many nations shall be joined to the LORD in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that the LORD of hosts hath sent me unto thee.

12And the LORD shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again.

13Be silent, O all flesh, before the LORD: for he is raised up out of his holy habitation.


6 posted on 03/28/2010 9:44:47 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (With God, Obama can't hurt us. Without God, George Washington couldn't save us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
Under US law as of 1995, Jerusalem is considered the capital of Israel. There is no reason whatsoever for Israel to seek approval of the Obamanoids or the UN thugs before building houses in its own capital. As BiBi noted, "This is not a "settlement," this is our capital."

The whole deal is just more Jew-hating from the UN left.

7 posted on 03/28/2010 9:48:14 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

The USA. Our govt is not the same as the people, who are overwhelmingly in support of Israel.


8 posted on 03/28/2010 9:49:32 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
As I said, Jewish voters (80% voted for Obama) who voted for him are taking note.

Ya think? What for? They won't change because of this.

9 posted on 03/28/2010 9:49:50 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I almost hope that the US abstains. Let’s get the truth out on the table and let G-d take over.


10 posted on 03/28/2010 9:54:09 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
The terrorists want part of Jerusalem as their capitol. They see any thing the Israelites do as wrong. We should give part of wahsinton DC to the terrorists along with London, Tehran, Moscow... for the terrorist capital.
11 posted on 03/28/2010 9:54:57 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
I hope all the Jewish voters who voted for Obama are taking note and will correct their mistake next time around.

Most American Jews are loyal only to one creed: Socialism. They could care less about Israel.

12 posted on 03/28/2010 10:02:03 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

This is a prime example of a dictator tossing supporters overboard when he no longer needs them. Jews make up 2.2% of the US population but hold disproportionate influence to their numbers due to larger concentrations of wealth in the Jewish population as well as the prominence of Jewish leaders in business, academia, politics, and the medical profession. Jews have been historically extremely liberal politically, supplying significant funding for the Democrat party as well as funding left wing political action groups. American Jews have also been big supporters of Israel, although some of the secular Jews in recent years seem to be less fervent in their support. US foreign policy for decades has tilted toward Israel and away from the Arabs due to the strong political influence of the American Jewish community as well as strong support from evangelical Christians in the Republican party.

Obama is the first US president raised in the Muslim faith. His father and stepfather were Muslims. He lived and was schooled in a Muslim nation during his early years. In his early adult life he was heavily influence spiritually by Jeremiah Wright who had been a Muslim. Whether or not he is currently a practicing Muslim, Obama clearly has strong sympathies for Muslims. As President, one of his first acts was to speak to the Muslim world. He has appointed radical Muslims to his administration.

Obama’s treatment of the prime minister of Israel during his recent visit to the White House was intentional. It communicated a lack of respect for the man and his country as well as signaled to the world symbolically an end to the special relationship with Israel. He is intentionally picking an unnecessary fight with Israel over the settlements. He is giving Islamic radicals a green light to attack Israel by signaling the US no longer supports the Jewish state.

With respect to the American Jewish community, Obama is telling them they are too small in numbers to matter at the ballot box. Furthermore, he has developed alternative sources of funding so even if the Jewish community stopped supporting him financially, he would have no problem funding his political campaigns and programs. Finally, Obama has set up the same dilemma for the Jewish community true conservatives have faced with the Republican establishment. Liberal Jews are unlikely to bolt the Democrat party over Israel because the Republican positions on social issues (gays, abortion, entitlement programs) are an anathema to them. Obama is counting on them to hold their nose and vote Democrat as the lesser of two evils in the same way the Republican party has told conservatives for years they are better than the alternative.

His bet is probably a good one. Other than Joe Lieberman, prominent Jews are largely silent on the shift in US policy, even with the shameful conduct of the President. Their statist goals must be taking precedence over any lingering emotional support for the Jewish state.

Obama is allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons. He has maintained the US military presence in the Middle East, despite his campaign promises to immediately pull-out. No doubt the Saudi’s, who funded his campaign under the table, are pulling the strings on the maintenance of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. The big question — When Iran gets nuclear weapons, will it use them on Israel, and if so will Obama do anything? Israel is a small country and it won’t take much to completely wipe it off the map. Somehow I can’t see this President using nuclear weapons on Iran or invading Iran if Israel is destroyed. The symbolism of this week’s meeting at the White House is too strong and the failure of the Jewish community to speak out suggests its influence is minimal in this White House.


13 posted on 03/28/2010 10:07:34 AM PDT by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
OBAMA THE PRESIDENT OF THE MUSLIM WORLD WILL BE TOAST IF THE USA DOES NOT SUPPORT ISRAEL IN THE UNITED NATIONS.

On the other hand he just may be President for life.

My greatest fear has always been that this Man has no of intention of giving up his current position as dictator.

Only God can change his plans.

14 posted on 03/28/2010 10:09:06 AM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

And to think the hit series 24 is canceled for lack of material.


15 posted on 03/28/2010 10:10:06 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Israels response to the UN should be the same as Iran’s response to the UN.

STFU-UN...


16 posted on 03/28/2010 10:13:13 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South; a fool in paradise

BUMP to your perceptive analysis.


17 posted on 03/28/2010 10:18:18 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Israels response to the UN should be the same as Iran’s response to the UN.

STFU-UN...


It usually exactly does this. (But this is because the US allways use their Veto power for them).
So this is a serious threat directed against Israel.
But i still think it´s an empty threat because the US
would never really do this.
(Israel would be “ruined” if the US would really do this).


18 posted on 03/28/2010 10:20:01 AM PDT by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

I wonder if the Israelis will at some point decide to take some direct action against Obama?Produce a copy of his real birth certificate,something worse?


19 posted on 03/28/2010 10:21:31 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop thinking about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
You know things are REALLY bad when the ADL comes out against a sitting democrat Communist president:

3/13/2010

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/86589-adl-shocked-stunned-at-white-houses-public-dressing-down-of-israel

"We are shocked and stunned at the Administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel on the issue of future building in Jerusalem," ADL director Abraham Foxman said in a statement. "We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a friend and ally of the United States.

And against a former democrat socialist president:

3/28/2010

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/03/28/1011395/adl-carters-apology-to-jewish-community-insincere Carter comments leave ADL doubting his ‘Al Chet’

March 28, 2010

(JTA) -- Jimmy Carter's apology last December to the Jewish community was insincere, the Anti-Defamation League said.

The Anti-Defamation League issued a statement last Friday questioning Carter's apology, which came in a letter published by JTA, following a speech by the former U.S. president during a conference in Atlanta last week on U.S.-Arab relations.

*** "I do not believe further discussions between us will be fruitful," Foxman wrote. ***


20 posted on 03/28/2010 10:42:20 AM PDT by Moe Tzadik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
Jews make up 2.2% of the US population but hold disproportionate influence to their numbers due to larger concentrations of wealth in the Jewish population as well as the prominence of Jewish leaders in business, academia, politics, and the medical profession.

The disproportionate influence of Jews is due to the Creator not their wealth.

The symbolism of this week’s meeting at the White House is too strong and the failure of the Jewish community to speak out suggests its influence is minimal in this White House.

The Jewish community HAS spoken - recently and uncharacteristically demonstrably. See my other post on this thread. To that you can add this Nearly 300 in Congress back keeping U.S.-Israel disputes private

You can be assured much more is going on behind the scenes.

21 posted on 03/28/2010 11:01:03 AM PDT by Moe Tzadik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: SmartInsight

“...relations between the allies have been severely strained by the announcement of plans to build 1,600 homes in an East Jerusalem settlement ...”

http://www.johnspeedie.com/healy/crap.wav


23 posted on 03/28/2010 11:23:10 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OP1kanob
“You are incorrect. These settlements including E Jer are illegal under international law. Continued US acquiescence is looking unlikely - welcome to the future my friends.”

In the future, Israel will continue to exist, irrespective of what the US does. The fact is that Israel, as little as it is, will always be able to hand the entire collection of Arab states their a**es, and no matter how much oil money is involved the Arab states won't be able to compete with Israel. The reason is that the Arab states have chosen to perpetuate hate and a antiquated world view that is holding their own societies back. The only way the Arab states can hurt Israel is with nukes or their equivalent, and if they use this approach it will guarantee the destruction of their own societies. Those are just the facts.

24 posted on 03/28/2010 11:37:56 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
"The terrorists want part of Jerusalem as their capitol"

And I want Mecca for my pig farm. My chances are a lot better than theirs.

25 posted on 03/28/2010 12:06:08 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
"But relations between the allies have been severely strained by the announcement of plans to build 1,600 homes"

There was no controversy in building these homes in a JEWISH neighborhood. Obama invented the controversy as an excuse to push his anti-Israel agenda.

26 posted on 03/28/2010 12:12:26 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OP1kanob

“You are incorrect. These settlements including E Jer are illegal under international law. Continued US acquiescence is looking unlikely - welcome to the future my friends.”

Would you please quote the “international laws” that prohibit settlements in EAST JERUSALEM?

The “laws” only apply to Gaza strip and the West Bank.

Your anti-semitism is showing. Are you an Obamabot?
Signed up today just to post this?


27 posted on 03/28/2010 12:25:36 PM PDT by SmartInsight (Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote. ~ G. J. Nathan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Look at his/her join date...


28 posted on 03/28/2010 12:33:31 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

LOL, and now he’s gone.


29 posted on 03/28/2010 12:34:19 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

30 posted on 03/28/2010 1:00:29 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkside321
But i still think it´s an empty threat because the US would never really do this. (Israel would be “ruined” if the US would really do this).

How many things has Obama already done that any sane American thought a POTUS would never do? I'm not sure failing to VETO a U.N. Resolution which would outlaw sovereign Israel control of its own capital would even make the top five.

Crazy, radical and reckless as it would be, I can't see why you think Obama wouldn't do it.

31 posted on 03/28/2010 1:27:14 PM PDT by Stultis (Democrats. Still devoted to the three S's: Slavery, Segregation and Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Email address of the Israeli Embassy:

info@washington.mfa.gov.il


32 posted on 03/28/2010 2:09:27 PM PDT by Jacquerie (There is food value in beer. There is no beer value in food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

I expected this passive-aggressive strategy the moment Obama was elected. The only surprise to me is that it’s taken so long.


33 posted on 03/28/2010 9:07:10 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

CHANGE. People voted for it without asking “to what?”.


34 posted on 03/29/2010 6:09:21 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
The US has always been pro-Israel — until Obama got elected, who is very clearly anti-Israel.

Hillary had a kiss for Arafat's wife when her husband was President.

(1999)

35 posted on 03/29/2010 6:11:21 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I did a segment on Zechariah 12 on my last podcast. "Interesting times".
36 posted on 03/29/2010 6:37:22 AM PDT by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Indeed they are.


37 posted on 03/29/2010 6:40:37 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson