Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

You are delusional. The SC has no authority over whether a president is duly elected. As I stated, that is the House and the House already ruled. No SC (except perhaps a liberal one overstepping its boundaries) would entertain the issue.

If you are proposing we have a SC overreach its authority and act outside of the constitution, then no I fully disagree with you and would not support such a move by our courts. We would lose any remaining respect for our constitution and all bets would be off.


43 posted on 03/28/2010 11:34:33 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa
You are delusional.

Enough. Stick with the issues and leave your immaturity and insecurity out of this.

The SC has no authority over whether a president is duly elected.

I'm not talking about the court ruling whether he's duly elected. You agreed if he was a fraud, his policies shouldn't stick. Likewsie, if a law is challenged in court and he's known to be a fraud, then they would have authority to make that determination and establish whether the law is valid. They don't have to overturn the election to overturn the laws.

45 posted on 03/28/2010 11:40:37 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

Regardless, what is the law on this issue? Has it been established what, as a legal matter, constitutes “natural born citizenship”? Is “natural born citizenship” determined solely by PLACE of birth? Does the citizenship of BOTH parents affect whether a person is a “natural born citizen”?

I understand and, to large extent, agree with the fact that the Court will not reach these questions unless brought to them in a legally cognizable way. However, that still leaves me wondering as to what the law actually is on the merits and whether it is settled.

I did a little reading on it a year or so ago and did not find anything definitive.


47 posted on 03/28/2010 11:59:50 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Are you a Twitter activist? Freepmail me & let's talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

You are delusional. The SC has no authority over whether a president is duly elected. As I stated, that is the House and the House already ruled. No SC (except perhaps a liberal one overstepping its boundaries) would entertain the issue.

while the SC probably would not rule on the legitimacy of the administration, it could,, and probably would,agree to hear separate cases challenging particular bills passed and signed into law by him....easily done, several in a day perhaps.


52 posted on 03/28/2010 12:37:14 PM PDT by terycarl (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson