[Tex-Con-Man]

You’re still dodging the question. Would you support having his policies remain in effect if he was proven to be a fraud and/or have committed fraud?? It’s a very simple question.

You seem to question everyone else's conservative street cred when they don't jump on board the BC bandwagon...and yet...I decided to peruse your posting record on FR and found that, other than a mild defense of Sean Penn on a first ammendment thread, your views on many other conservative issues are virtually unknown.

Page after page after page of an obsession with this one issue...2nd amendment? Abortion? Government run Healthcare?

It would be great for you to spread some of your zeal to other worthwhile conservative causes...there are many.

[edge919]

You seem to question everyone else's conservative street cred when they don't jump on board the BC bandwagon...and yet...I decided to peruse your posting record on FR and found that, other than a mild defense of Sean Penn on a first ammendment thread, your views on many other conservative issues are virtually unknown.

I didn't question anyone's 'conservative street cred.' I asked a very specific question regarding Obama being found out as a fraud in response to Raycpa saying the BC issue was a waste of time in hoping his policies could be overturned. Why on Earth would you assume it was about so-called street cred and feel compelled to make an irrelevant comparison on what I think about other issues??