Replies

Was this a variation of the "are you still beating your wife?" question?

You tell me. Read the question again and your response.

My question: "Would you support having his policies remain in effect if he was proven to be a fraud and/or have committed fraud??"

Your response: "Your question is stupid but here goes. I would not support virtually everything he signed or stands for."

Was that too tricky for you?? Did you feel backed into a corner of something?? Do you honestly think that was "beat your wife question'?? Why all the namecalling and petulance??