Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

The way a society should run is for every able bodied person to have a job, not for a huge group to receive financial aid from the rest of us (the aid takes numerous forms including tax and mortgage breaks and now healthcare). Now a huge group (40 percent or so) pays no taxes. Crazy, man! And here we are cranking up a healthcare program to give additional aid primarily to that same 40 percent.

Universal healthcare is a wonderful idea from a moral standpoint. The only problem is cost. The only real solution is for practically everyone to make enough to to pay for their universal level of healthcare. The solution is not to have the universal level of healthcare to be so expensive that an enormous fraction of our population must have a subsidy. Massive programs where one part of the population takes care of another part only sap the society’s energy and motivation.


25 posted on 03/28/2010 2:57:50 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frposty
I don't agree with your viewpoint on the morality of "universal coverage," but here's a graph you'll want to see.


30 posted on 03/28/2010 3:02:35 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson