Posted on 03/28/2010 4:17:27 PM PDT by Colofornian
A Davis County juvenile court attorney is seeing at least one case a week involving teenagers as young as the seventh grade who send or ask for nude photographs via texting.
Pre-teens and teenagers who take nude photos and text them to friends often do not realize they are abusing themselves, officials say.
April is Child Abuse and Sexual Assault Awareness month. Officials in the Top of Utah are hoping parents will become more vigilant and educate their children that sending nude photos or sexually explicit texts is illegal, as well as inappropriate.
"Kids are braver and more willing to say things with text messages than they would in person," said Doug Miller, the director of Davis County's Children Justice Center.
It is becoming more common for sixth- and seventh-graders to send nude photos of themselves to older students in junior high and high school, he said.
And the preteens do not realize they can be charged with a class B misdemeanor in juvenile court for sending the explicit photographs. If the perpetrators are 16 or 17 years old, they can be charged with a class A misdemeanor for distributing pornographic material.
"They don't seem to appreciate, or have a real understanding, of what they are doing," said Deputy Davis County Attorney Ryan Perkins, who is assigned to 2nd District Juvenile Court in Farmington.
Perkins said he gets at least one case a week concerning teenagers as young as the seventh grade who are sending or asking for nude photographs.
Perkins said the law was changed following a "sex sting" that involved students at Farmington Junior High School and other schools in Davis School District in 2008. Before the change, only felony charges could be filed in such cases.
The majority of his cases are girls being charged with having or sending pornographic images on their cell phones, Perkins said.
"The boys are requesting it, and the girls send it as a way to get attention," he said.
Cindy Lorrigan, a victim's advocate with the Box Elder County Attorney's Office, said her office is seeing more of these types of cases, although it seems to her more boys are being charged than girls.
"They don't understand the ramifications of what can happen," Lorrigan said.
"Once (the photo) is sent out, it can go anywhere. It can be posted on the Internet. All of their friends at school can see it. They just don't think far enough ahead."
Syracuse Police Sgt. Heath Rogers said parents need to take charge and look at what their teens and preteens are doing with their cell phones.
Buying a cell phone without a camera is almost impossible, but "if you're paying the bill, then be a parent and teach them that, once you send a picture, you don't know who it's going to," Rogers said.
He said the teens are either acting before thinking about the long-term consequences or falling under peer pressure.
"We had a case where a young lady took a photo of herself and sent it to her boyfriend. He sent it to several of his friends," Rogers said. "This girl is terrified that it is passing around the school."
Max Rogers, director of the NetSmartz Program with the Utah Alliance of Boys & Girls Clubs, said there's an attitude among teens, especially those of high school age, who think, "If it doesn't show my face, it's not attached to me."
What they fail to realize is the recipient knows who sent the photo, he said.
Max Rogers and six other representatives visit schools throughout the state, offering presentations about the Internet and cell phone safety.
The presentations include video clips, including one that depicts a photo of a girl on a bulletin board.
"It's not a naked picture or anything like that, but you can hear clicks, like downloading as other students look at it, then someone takes it down and hands it to another person," Max Rogers said.
The girl comes back in the classroom sees her photo on the bulletin board and tries to take it down, only to have it reappear, again and again, he said.
"You can watch (the students') faces and see which ones are putting themselves at risk."
Our youth are being targeted.
(And if the "temple" emphasized to them is a building for ritualistic purposes -- and not as much their body for residential purposes...hosting the Holy Spirit...then all the more we see ready catering to bodily abuse & exploitation).
Parents?
What are they?
This is 2010.
Why do children need phones with texting?
Because phones capable of taking voice messages are far in the future ?
1 new case a week in tiny Ogden UT...
This is undoubtedly an epidemic in the larger, more libertine coastal population centers. I can't even imagine.
We're losing the culture war, folks. Each new generation is even more screwed up than the last one.
(As a side note, it is interesting to think about how much communication infrastructure is now contaminated with child pornography on account of this activity, and what kind of unexpected legal implications that might have.)
“Pre-teens and teenagers who take nude photos and text them to friends often do not realize they are abusing themselves,...”
Hardly. They know how to operate a cellphone. They know exactly what they are doing. They just don’t know the implications of it.
Compare it to a hunch-puppy, that doesn’t know why it wants to hunch, just that it wants to hunch.
They don't. They don't need TV, either.
Interestingly nude photographs of kids online is not illegal, do a search.
Neither it is illegal to show kids hardcore porn, although the only reason I can think of to do that is to desensitize them to being molested.
nude photographs of kids online, not porn of course, is legal. Some of the sites will make you very mad though so don’t look for them.
Why would you say that? Try posting a photo of a nude child and see how quick you go to jail if caught.
A large percentage of these photos are likely to fall under the "lascivious exhibition" and/or "masturbation" criteria, given the circumstances under which they were taken.
Often it is a matter of prosecutorial discretion, which has been abused before.
As more and more of this garbage enters circulation, it becomes inevitable that CP will show up on secondhand/refurb phones, memory cards, hard drives, ipods, and so forth. A lot of innocent people will unwittingly come into possession of prohibited images, while at the same time the sickos and perverts will have plausible deniability because "it's everywhere now." Not a good situation at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.