Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's Something in thw Water
http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/opinion/83635132.html?corder=reverse ^ | John Wennersten

Posted on 03/29/2010 5:42:06 AM PDT by truthfinder9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: truthfinder9

Didn’t this issue pop up several years ago? And wasn’t it disproved in short order?

Oh, that’s right. Research funding time again.


21 posted on 03/29/2010 6:42:09 AM PDT by CPOSharky (What outrage will the administration foist upon We the People that will be the last straw?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

A short while ago another report cited the amounts of prescription drugs in the water. This report, outside plastics, may largely deal with results of a overly sensualized society in the post-Christian West. 98 percent of American women use some form of contraception during their lives, and 1 out of 4 with STDS with many on drugs, while 1 out of 3 pregnancies end in abortion, with 40 percent of American women having had abortions.

Worse, there’s no water in Hell.


22 posted on 03/29/2010 6:49:04 AM PDT by daniel1212 ("Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I knew it... It’s the water in Washington DC, that robs Democrats of their minds, and Republicans of their spines!


23 posted on 03/29/2010 7:10:15 AM PDT by FiddlePig (truth is hard... lies are easy - http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
and ruffles on their shirts.

Hey dude! I love my ruffled shirt...and beads.

(JK, believe me!)

24 posted on 03/29/2010 7:31:57 AM PDT by Huebolt (Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

“Whatever happened to our Purity of Essence?”

Mandrake, your average Commie could care less about the sanctity of our precious bodily fluids ;-).


25 posted on 03/29/2010 7:33:10 AM PDT by edh (I need a better tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

For example, Blazer has found male smallmouth bass with both male and female sex organs attempting to lay eggs.
NEVER take your fish to California they will never be the same.


26 posted on 03/29/2010 8:29:26 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

They also report that all sources of drinking water contains birth control chemicals. Probably the source of decreased birth rates and increased numbers of homosexuals from the estrogen changing our children’s sexual orientation.


27 posted on 03/29/2010 9:29:12 AM PDT by macglencoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: macglencoe

62% of the 62 million women aged 15–44 are currently using a contraceptive method (30% the pill, 27% male or female tubal sterilization)

The typical U.S. woman wants only 2 children. To achieve this goal, she must use contraceptives for roughly 3 decades.

Only 5% of U.S. Women are virgins. Sources and more stats at http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/RevealingStatistics.html


28 posted on 03/29/2010 12:33:03 PM PDT by daniel1212 ("Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
Indian Country Today
29 posted on 03/29/2010 12:33:44 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; macglencoe

This “problem” is entirely pushed by Environmental Working Group, a Soros funded bunch of lunatics.

Anything measured in parts per billion in the water is nothing to be concerned with. Anything in parts per trillion (many of these chemicals in the water fall in this category) is a joke.

Just because traces of hormones (endocrine disrupters) are measurable in the water these fish are in, do not mean the two are related. These people would prefer massive regulation to eliminate any trace of chemicals in water, whether there is a threat or not.

This is not about our health, or the health of fish.


30 posted on 03/29/2010 12:55:40 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; macglencoe
"The 'problem' is entirely pushed by Environmental Working Group..."

No, that's not true. The problem is that male fish and male amphibians are developing eggs and egg proteins in their testes, that this phenomenon is expanding, that it has been documented in hundreds of major watersheds in Europe, North America and elsewhere, and that a degradation of male reproductive anatomy and physiology may be weakening binary sexual differentiation in other phyla as well.

Soros' Environmental Working Group may be "pushing" the idea that this is caused by RightWingitude or Republicoplastics or poly-Bushinated Bushphenyls, but they are NOT advancing the bothersome hypothesis that they are caused (in part) by synthetic female hormone effluents related to oral contraceptives.

If I had money (which I don't) I would place a sure bet that the Soros groups are majorly invested in hormonal contraceptives, and the universal acceptance thereof.

31 posted on 03/29/2010 1:13:18 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (" I never saw a more Spreading lot of animals in my life, and in all the wrong places." - Eeyore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Check out Eugene P. Macri’s blog......

http://macrisplace.blogspot.com/2007/04/rush-limbaugh-greatest-idiot-ever.html

Dr.Blazer’s deductions seem to involve a very small number of fish...

http://www.zoominfo.com/Search/ReferencesView.aspx?PersonID=185356286&lastName=Blazer&firstName=Vicki&searchSource=page&page=5

If you dig deep enough, environuts are behind this, I guarantee. You should question even the basic research...just like global warming. Zealous tree huggers are everywhere in the universities and government agencies.

Remember...

1 ppm = one drop in 13 gallons

1 ppb = one drop in 13,000 gallons

1ppt = one drop in 13,000,000 gallons

If history is any guide, they won’t even publish the concentrations of the pollutants.

I’m not trying to diminish your concerns, just giving you a heads up!


32 posted on 03/29/2010 2:59:11 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson