Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7

No troll. Gun owner and all my children know how to use (and own) firearms responsibly. Liberal on some things, Conservative on others, most particularly support 2nd Amendment Rights. I support the RESPONSIBLE militia movement. I would have NO problem defending my country or my home should it under attack by Right Wing, Left Wing or foreign radicals.

The point I’m trying to make here is that I have absolutely NO truck with movements that mix guns or violence with religion. That is anathema to me, under any circumstances.


587 posted on 03/30/2010 7:15:43 AM PDT by aberistwith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies ]


To: Just Lori
Doing great, Lori!

How are you? :-)

588 posted on 03/30/2010 7:25:06 AM PDT by Allegra (SEIU delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

To: aberistwith; Candor7

Your point is noted as is your naivete. IF you cannot see that this is a FIRST step to the government declaring that NO militias are “responsible,” then you are either being very disingenuous, or you are selectively blind.
The charges in the “indictment” are so vague that, as I said, if upheld in a court of law, can be attributed to ANY group or militia, whether organized or not, and whether you train at a gun club, a shooting range, on your own property, or anywhere TWO or more gather...even if your weapons are legal and you have NEVER uttered a single word against this government. YOU are NOW the enemy.


590 posted on 03/30/2010 7:43:33 AM PDT by MestaMachine (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426869/posts SUPPORT RINO FREE AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

To: aberistwith

I agree...having lost two relatives who were wonderful cops to violent crime, I am disgusted by any group that would target law enforcement officials who, in general, protect people.


594 posted on 03/30/2010 8:51:42 AM PDT by megapatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

To: aberistwith; Candor7

The point I’m trying to make here is that I have absolutely NO truck with movements that mix guns or violence with religion.


Still, your meaning is 100% murky. Just WHAT do you mean by “mixing” religion and guns? Or “movement”? (I hope you had one this morning!).

Please, be clear. Many people want to know what you mean. So far, it looks as though you are attempting to slander anyone who holds religious beliefs and is a gun owner, to paint them with “nutjob gap toothed evil militia insurgent”.

You are also intimating that someone who is a gun owner is also “violent”.

Make your case.


597 posted on 03/30/2010 9:01:48 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

To: aberistwith

People are still waiting to see your clarification of “religion and guns” being a bad combo.

tick tick tick tick ——

Is your shift over, then?


611 posted on 03/30/2010 2:50:31 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson