Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poundstone
the assumption is that if a person is a government employee, then he or she is lazy and shiftless

The issue is not so much government employees, as it is unionized government employees, or in fact unionized employees of any sort. Unions take away the incentive to work because they make it impossible to fire unproductive employees.

5 posted on 03/29/2010 10:00:07 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Thane_Banquo

“The issue is not so much government employees, as it is unionized government employees, or in fact unionized employees of any sort. Unions take away the incentive to work because they make it impossible to fire unproductive employees. “

Partly. But my beef is with bureaucracies more than bureaucrats. No matter who staffs them, there is a relentless urge to expand turf and increase size. They are constantly looking for more things to do. As their mandate is usually to “help” me with more “useful” regulations and other interferences in my life, the relentless expansion of their turf both increases my taxes to pay for all the new helpful people they have to employ and the time I have to spend dealing with all their “useful” interference.

That’s why it doesn’t matter if the bureaucrats are “good” or “bad.” A bureaucracy has a dynamic all its own that is pernicious regardless who staffs it.

And that’s why cutting an agency’s budget does nothing. It just expands later. One has to eliminate the agency altogether so there is noone cheering to make it bigger and do more things to “help” ModelBreaker every year.


40 posted on 03/29/2010 10:40:37 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson