Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-35 vs. F-16 Range - The Ghastly Truth
Aviation Week ^ | 3/31/2010 | Bill Sweetman

Posted on 03/31/2010 4:44:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Yo-Yo; sukhoi-30mki
Oops, sorry. Meant to post this on the Figher Gap thread.
21 posted on 03/31/2010 6:45:41 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

I need to watch myself. I’m tired of the blatantly false information being spread around and will probably get myself in trouble if I’m not careful.

Yesterday there was some “article” about a simulated fight between a flight of F35’s and F/A18’s engaging a flight of Flankers and the outcome was 1 Flanker down and the two flights of good guys (8 total) all going down.

Utter BS. The F35’s and F/A18’s engaged them visually vs. using their OTH capabilities.

The misinformation/disinformation war against the F35 is in full swing. This is how the F22 fleet size got cut so badly and how the Presidential helo program got axed.


22 posted on 03/31/2010 6:56:49 AM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

Yes that was from Air Power Australia. They are down on the F-18E/F Super-Hornet and the F-35 (because they did not get the F-22), so the article is not surprising.

They make some absurd comparisons of the F-35 to other airplanes, such as our F-105 for one.

I have read most if not all of that website. And they were also in love with the F-111, wanted to keep it flying to 2015 and longer with advanced versions if I recall correctly.


23 posted on 03/31/2010 7:23:21 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

24 posted on 03/31/2010 7:27:03 AM PDT by luckybogey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

If the USA is not going to allow the F22 to be built and sold for FMS, why the tantrum?

It’s not like the Aussies can overturn the decisions on their own. I suspect they’re doing this to put more pressure on their pols to in turn put more pressure on the USA to allow FMS sales to Australia?

I don’t know that I would mind that so much, the Aussies have always been dependable allies. I would feel the same about the Brits as well except for their hard lurch to the left recently. The muzzie thing there (GB) has me a bit concerned as well.


25 posted on 03/31/2010 7:36:35 AM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I really don’t know what to believe save to say that the data does not favor the F-35 claims.

Instinctively, it feels improbable to build a quality tool that fits all tasks.

It also feels like we are in trouble with not enough airplanes, not enough of the right types and what appears to be an increasingly demoralized air force who feel doomed to fly radio controlled airplanes.


26 posted on 03/31/2010 7:58:05 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Bookmarked.


27 posted on 03/31/2010 8:04:16 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776; militant2; TaMoDee; freedumb2003; PERKY2004

F-16 ping.


28 posted on 03/31/2010 9:19:52 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I have seen the various gloved F-16 delta's but this one slipped my radar.

Wow....

Delta wings/Low Aspect Ratios have more sweet spots than people realize, one being the ability to have high internal fuel stores, especially if the airfoil gets a high % thickness.

I read a while back, Lockheed Martin had Solid Modeled the Saab Drakken Double Delta to run it within their CFD software.

One may ask a real curious, Why?

29 posted on 03/31/2010 9:26:38 AM PDT by taildragger (Palin/Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey


30 posted on 03/31/2010 5:28:11 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SZonian
Why the F-22 and the PAK-FA have the “Right Stuff” and why the F/A-18 and the F-35 do not

http://www.ndu.edu/press/jfq_pages/editions/i57/kopp.pdf

Save the PDF document and bookmark the Air Power Australia homepage website on your browser.

31 posted on 03/31/2010 7:11:25 PM PDT by myknowledge (B.H. Obama's just a frontman. A frontman for who? The globalist elite, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson