Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'No' vote on health care costs Holden primary endorsement from AFL-CIO (Eating their own! Ha!)
republicanherald.com ^ | April 1, 2010 | DUSTIN PANGONIS

Posted on 04/01/2010 6:05:30 AM PDT by pillut48

Pennsylvania's largest labor union voted Monday to refrain from endorsing a candidate in the primary election between U.S. Rep. Tim Holden, D-17, and challenger Sheila Dow Ford, dropping traditional support for Holden after his vote against the health care re-form bill.

"He's been good to us on a number of bread-and-butter issues, but this was a revolutionary, historical vote," Pennsylvania AFL-CIO President Bill George said in a telephone interview Wednesday.

The AFL-CIO met Tuesday in Harrisburg to hold its general primary endorsement meeting for federal candidates in Pennsylvania. George said the 54-member executive board voted unanimously not to make an endorsement in the May 18 contest between Holden and Dow Ford.

Holden was one of 34 Democrats who voted against the health care reform legislation that passed through the House 219-212 last week. George said the 17th District - which includes Dauphin, Lebanon, Schuylkill and parts of Perry and Berks counties - "leaves a lot to be desired" in quality of health care.

"You have one of the worst health care systems in the state of Pennsylvania as far as people getting access. You have one of the highest cost areas ... you have a high percent that's uninsured." George said. "For him to sit there and do nothing is, to me, a disgrace."

(Excerpt) Read more at republicanherald.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
So, the punishment/shunning/attacking Democrats who voted against the anti-American, anti-Constitutional travesty has begun! Schadenfreude? I don't know the Tim Holden guy--is he one who might switch parties, or deeply liberal who wanted MORE crap in Obamacare?
1 posted on 04/01/2010 6:05:30 AM PDT by pillut48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pillut48

The rank and file of the unions need to confront their “leaders” and ask why they are being sold out.


2 posted on 04/01/2010 6:10:29 AM PDT by Clock King (There's no way to fix D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

If he voted “no” because his constitutents told him to, he and they might all take a look at the Tea Party of principled people

The democrats talk like losing an AFL-CIO endorsement and NOT having zerO campaign for them is a bad thing! LOL! Tell all those retired school teachers and senior citizens (and their families) in Lehigh and Dauphin that historic obamacare solved their problems, especially when MEDICARE cuts kick in after 1 October

Maybe he’d sooner have Senator Scott Brown campaign for him, than obama.


3 posted on 04/01/2010 6:12:51 AM PDT by silverleaf (Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Grin. I love the smell of napalm in the morning. It smells like . . . victory.


4 posted on 04/01/2010 6:13:26 AM PDT by Woebama (Never, never, never quit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Well, because the unions backed this ‘revolutionary’ bill, many of us will do our utmost to avoid buying anything made by union labor.


5 posted on 04/01/2010 6:14:26 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clock King
The rank and file of the unions need to confront their “leaders” and ask why they are being sold out.

Just a wild-eyed guess, but there may be guarantees made to the rank and file of health care or insurance which are unfunded, for what ever reason, but likely tied to either basing such claims on older life length paradigms or the >ahem< movement of funds which make those benefits impracticable without either Federal intervention or some severe adjustments to the inflow of money or benefits themselves.

In short, without Obamacare, the benefits cannot be delivered. One way to lose power in organized labor fast is to renege on promises which the dues have already been collected for.

All sorts of people are looking to stay in power by using other people's money to back the promises they made.

6 posted on 04/01/2010 6:19:04 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Holden is the rep for our district. Whoever gets the Democratic nomination will face Republican Dave Argall in November.


7 posted on 04/01/2010 6:26:32 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

When the union realizes that voting no was a good thing for american workers including the workers who are in these few unions, then it will be too late. By then the black market with its underground labor force will have taken over as a means to avoid the shakedown transfer of wealth tax intended to kill small business growth as a means for obama to bribe union voters with free viagra for life without pre existing conditions.

The unions have shot themselves in the foot, because what legitimate union business is going to survive competing with under the table operations that are going to spring up around the country just as they have done in places like Los Angeles who can hire illegal immigrants and pay no taxes and provide no benefits at one third the costs?

It might be a good thing for these candidates that the union is NOT endorsing them, because although the unions are blinded by their greed and can’t see the train wreck ahead, an overwhelming majority of the public, including most moderates and a growing number of democrats can see the train wreck this health care bill will have on jobs and the economy unless the runaway obama express can be stopped in it tracks! An non endorsement may mean this guy has a better chance of being elected!


8 posted on 04/01/2010 6:39:22 AM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

This is why so many Rats voted against the express wishes and interest of their constituents. They threat from their Union bosses was explicit.
Democrats can’t win an election without union thuggery, so most took the less risky path of voting for 0bamacare, hoping union thuggery could stem the tide against them in November. They weighed their odds and came to the conclusion that their chances for reelection with the help of union goons was slim, but it was nonexistant with the union bosses against them.

This is what was going on behind the scenes of the 0bamacare debate.


9 posted on 04/01/2010 6:40:38 AM PDT by counterpunch (The Emperor has no Cloture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree
Holden is the rep for our district. Whoever gets the Democratic nomination will face Republican Dave Argall in November.

Argall is the PA Republican RINO pick for the seat. The PA Republican Party has never tried very hard to topple Tim Holden. Frank Ryan is the "real" Conservative challenger. Don't be duped by the PA RINO Republican Party. Remember, they're the same people who gave us Arlen Specter.

http://frankryan.org/index.htm

10 posted on 04/01/2010 6:40:43 AM PDT by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson