In my opinion, modern day anarchism is just another way of saying socialism. It ought to tell you something about a movement (socialism) when they have to hide behind so many different titles to try to confuse people.
I enjoyed the article. The guy spends the first half of the article trying to identify with the tea partiers, then puts in the twist with property rights. He then goes on to rail against big business beause they own everything. Never once mentioning the fact that most tea partiers probably own a good deal of private property and have no intention of giving it up.
It's what the founder of their ideology specializes in. (John 8:44)