Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Palin skeptic takes a second look
World Magazine ^ | April 1, 2010 | D.C. Innes

Posted on 04/01/2010 6:37:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The Obamacare victory has changed the presidential race for 2012. The question for Republicans in choosing a candidate to go up against the sitting president is: Who has the skill, the vision, the mettle, and the integrity to drive this Behemoth back into the churning sea of political evils from whence it came? Obviously, Mitt Romney, who as governor gave Massachusetts a monster with similar features, is beyond consideration. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels may yet rise to the call of his historic duty and serve. Or not.

But some will shout from the back of the room, “Sarah Palin!” And some others of us (who are looking in at the room from the street through the windows) are accustomed to dismissing that notion with a knowing “whatever” of political sagacity. She hasn’t the intellectual preparation even at the most basic level of popular reading and general knowledge, as the Katie Couric interview during the campaign demonstrated. Aside from that, she has clearly abandoned political ambition in favor of the lucrative world of infotainment. Once a political figure signs on as a news analyst (to say nothing of reality shows), he or she has chosen the one-way political off-ramp. Mike Huckabee has made this choice. Talk show hosts do not become presidents.

But anything can happen in politics. No less than the sage of neo-conservatism, Norman Podhoretz (who was interviewed by Marvin Olasky in the current WORLD), has jolted this Palin skeptic into a second look at her potential suitability as a candidate “for such as time as this.” In a Wall Street Journal article, “In Defense of Sarah Palin,” Podhoretz concedes from the start that Sarah Palin is “no Ronald Reagan,” and he is not necessarily suggesting that she would make a great president. Nonetheless, she has qualities that are and have been dangerously missing in Democratic presidents over the last 35 years:

“Take, for example, foreign policy. True, she seems to know very little about international affairs, but expertise in this area is no guarantee of wise leadership. After all, her rival for the vice presidency, who in some sense knows a great deal, was wrong on almost every major issue that arose in the 30 years he spent in the Senate.

“What she does know—and in this respect, she does resemble Reagan—is that the United States has been a force for good in the world, which is more than Barack Obama, whose IQ is no doubt higher than hers, has yet to learn. Jimmy Carter also has a high IQ, which did not prevent him from becoming one of the worst presidents in American history, and so does Bill Clinton, which did not prevent him from befouling the presidential nest.”

While expertise in international affairs doesn’t guarantee wise leadership, I’m far from convinced there can be wise leadership without at least many years of adult attention to the ups and downs of national and international political life, whether directly or by reading great accounts of it.

Podhortez’s point, however, emphasizes the indispensable value of a moral and political orientation that’s consistent with our form of government, supports our political tradition, and recognizes the harsh realities of dealing with nations that reject our politics and basic moral outlook. She has that. And while ill-read, she is not ill-bred. Though her native intelligence may not be Bill Clinton’s, she’s clearly a fast learner and was plenty sharp enough to master Alaska politics and the oil companies up there.

In other words, if what the country needs to pull us out of our free fall into European social democracy is someone with a solid center in classical republican principles as well as the skill, vision, mettle, and integrity to pull it off politically, Sarah Palin may be the one to do it.

I’m not convinced, but I’m listening.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; gop; obama; palin; reagan; romney; romneycare; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I've said that from day one. I've seen nothing to suggest Obama is brilliant at anything other than perhaps community organizing. There are no legal opinions, no legal cases, no papers, no grades, no anything in evidence to indicate a “high IQ”.

It is all the Emperor's New Clothes as presented by the MSM weavers of perception...

21 posted on 04/01/2010 7:02:46 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“Palin is a work in progress.”

And what a work. Her first appearance alone was one of the great political appearances in recent memory. I think a lot of people forget how electric she was that night.


22 posted on 04/01/2010 7:03:08 PM PDT by jessduntno ( If someone calls me racist, I reply "you are just saying that because I'm white!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We need to realize that whatever candidate will have perceived weakness (whether real or not) that the Rats and MSM will attack and make that the issue.

We need a candidate that has strong values and principles and is willing and able to lead with a strong backbone. They need to find staff and cabinets members that will follow that leadership with specific skills and abilities and will be sufficiently non self serving for the benefit of public and the right economic and international policies.

We will not have a perfect candidate, even Reagan wasn’t perfect, but Republicans need to argue persuasively but accept a reasonable candidate and stop the warfare within the party. We also must stop elevating the next in line to the nomination .... we will continue to lose with McCain, Doyle, etc candidates.

I like Sarah, she is not perfect, but has good character and a strong backbone and the Rats are scared silly.


23 posted on 04/01/2010 7:04:36 PM PDT by ADSUM (Democracy works when citizens get involved and keep government honest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
D.C. Innes drivel, written for the purpose of quoting other hack's insults to Sarah.

Zer0's teleprompter has a higher IQ than Hussein.

The only thing the man child can do better than Palin is bow to Monarchs and Emperors, especially the Mohammedan kind.

24 posted on 04/01/2010 7:05:02 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I remember in 2006, when BHO was just gearing to make his run for POUS, some talking head made a comment that BHO had a 126 or 127 IQ (I don’t remember the exact number). If I remember correctly, wasn’t GWB’s IQ something like 146? If so, and the liberals call him stupid and BHO a genius. Go figure...

Semper fi


25 posted on 04/01/2010 7:06:47 PM PDT by MASS-2 FAC (Get premium healtcare - run for congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let’s say for the sake of argument that Obama does have a higher IQ then Sarah. So what?

I’ll take everyday, American common sense over Marxist ideologue any day of the week. A person does not need to be a Stephen Hawkins to run this country, they do need to know what is best for her and to put that first.

Obama fails at that simple truth daily.


26 posted on 04/01/2010 7:08:11 PM PDT by Brytani (Good Morning Comrades!!! FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Being a "mensa" member has very little to do with the making of a great leader.

Clinton was supposed to have been a "genius", yet he didn't have the forsight and/or maturity to keep his johnson corralled.

Carter? Intelligent? Well, I was in the media during his years and read a lot of news stories about him...it just ain't so.

And now, obama...popularity and radical ideas do not a leader, or intelligent person make - hordes of hollywood "celebs" have proven that with their infantile grasp of politic and leftist ideology.

The left - who are supposed to be the all-knowing elitists - don't show a lot of intelligence either; for instance, they don't get it that socialism has FAILED everytime it's been tried; communism is a failure as well.

The biggest idiots in the world are those who thinky they are smarter than the rest of us, for such arrogance is fleeting, at best. They fly high for a while, then fall under the weight of their own faulty judgements and wrongheaded ideology; when they do, they revert from the "elite" back into the whining "victims" they love to be.

Besides, I would think that Palin's avalanche of popularity is based on something, and obama fall in to the abyss of popularity is based on something...only a complete idiot can't figure out that "something".
27 posted on 04/01/2010 7:09:16 PM PDT by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah will lead us out of the Obama/democrat swamp we are in now. That is good enough. I will support her.


28 posted on 04/01/2010 7:15:30 PM PDT by Rapscallion (God is no longer protecting America from Marxist Communism. Pray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I am of average intelligence...as average as average can get and my speeches would be on Obie’s level of intellect.

But I know how to say Corpsman. He’s in for a huge defrocking of his inteeligence, his power, his honesty, his everything.


29 posted on 04/01/2010 7:22:02 PM PDT by chiller ( ALMOST SPEECHLESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Am watching Sarah’s hr. special right now on FOX.


30 posted on 04/01/2010 7:22:12 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Me too.


31 posted on 04/01/2010 7:23:21 PM PDT by onyx (Facts don't matter. Proof not required. Anything goes! Racial slurs, death threats.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; onyx

.
“She hasn’t the intellectual preparation even at the most basic level of popular reading and general knowledge, as the Katie Couric interview during the campaign demonstrated”

.
That was as far as I read. The writer is a moron beyond salvation.

Palin’s intellect is the only one that is not in question for the 2012 race. Our real threat is that a woman of such intelligence could subject us to her better judgment and deem this ash heap of a country beyond fixing, and not run.


32 posted on 04/01/2010 7:23:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Me too ... great show! Loving it.


33 posted on 04/01/2010 7:25:36 PM PDT by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; 2ndDivisionVet; USFRIENDINVICTORIA
She hasn’t the intellectual preparation even at the most basic level of popular reading and general knowledge

Complete, utter, total bullsh!t, as anyone who's ever seen "Jay walking" knows. The average American can barely spell their own name any more.

And, side note to the author, that sentence snippet is POORLY, awkwardly written. Especially for someone who makes a living writing.

34 posted on 04/01/2010 7:28:13 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (Joe McCarthy was right. He was just early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

I heard Barracuda Sarah in Beaumont TX at the Motivation Seminar And she is Beautiful, Brilliant, communicates like RR, and most important, She is one of us and not one of them.Perky Kate is another highly overpaid talking Head.
barbra ann


35 posted on 04/01/2010 7:29:04 PM PDT by barb-tex (Obama Care ls spending part of the Half trillion on Logans Merry-Go-Round)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Policy Chick
36 posted on 04/01/2010 7:29:25 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM

Well said.


37 posted on 04/01/2010 7:39:07 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

She is one of us and not one of them.
- - - - - - - - -
It’s going to take a person who is strong in their beliefs, fearless of criticism, and morally courageous to undo the damage done to our country. It’s going to require not just cutting budgets and programs, but cutting entire departments. We can’t dink around the edges. We have to perform major surgery to save the patient and then we have to get out of the way and let the patient recover.

Sarah Palin has the qualities we need and I wouldn’t sell her short in the intelligence department. She has been right on every issue she has taken Obama to task on and he has been wrong, so who’s smarter?


38 posted on 04/01/2010 7:53:47 PM PDT by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
I'm a Palin supporter.

However, I saw the Couric interview and I thought Palin looked dumber than a post in it.

Still, Sarah is the BEST retail politician of the 21st century, solidly grounded in the right principles AND MY CHOICE, so far.

39 posted on 04/01/2010 7:54:07 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Oh.... thanks for mentioning. I had forgotten about her being on tonite. Came in to the show right when I saw your mention at 10:47 during Toby Keith. I hope it will be available again on-line or later some time.


40 posted on 04/01/2010 7:54:34 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson