Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walz(D-Mn) to Students: Bipartisan Solution Needed with National Debt
Post-Bulletin Company ^ | 3/30/2010 | By Heather J. Carlson

Posted on 04/02/2010 3:16:22 AM PDT by Son House

ST. CHARLES — Standing before a crowd of high school students, 1st District Rep. Tim Walz pointed to a screen with a 14-digit number sprawled across the screen. That number, amounting to more than $12.6 trillion, is the current national debt.

"Whoa," said a high-schooler seated in the crowd.

During an all-school assembly Tuesday at St. Charles High School, Walz made the case that students need to care about the rising debt levels because their future depends on it. He said now is the time for politicians of both parties to work on a solution.

"When the government spends more money than it takes in, your family pays the price," the Democrat told students.

For more than a year, the divisive issue of health care reform has dominated federal politics. But with the recent passage of a health-care reform bill, Walz is looking to focus on other issues, including the economy, creating jobs and the national debt.

In the lead-up to the November election, Republicans have been blasting Walz, accusing him of reckless spending because he supported the $787 billion stimulus bill and the nearly $1 trillion health-care bill.

But while speaking to students, he emphasized that he believes it is critical to reach a bipartisan solution on the national debt. He said he has been meeting with two Republican lawmakers — Rep. Jeff Sessions of Alabama and Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma — to discuss ways to tackle the debt problem.

During his talk, Walz told students that they need to care because if the debt climbs too high, it could affect how much they end up paying for student loans, and whether they can get a car loan. It could also make it harder to get a job, and wages could end up being lower.

Unless something is done, Walz said, by the year 2040 every dollar in taxes will go to Social Security and Medicare and pay interest on the debt. There won't be any money "for a road, for a school, for a tank, for a soldier, for anybody," he said.

Walz told students that people disagree on the government's stimulus plan. He said that in his opinion it was needed to boost the economy and prevent a deeper recession.

When it comes to the budget, he said, the political divide centers on how to grow the economy. He said Republicans believe you grow the economy by leaving money in the private sector; Democrats have traditionally believed that investing in infrastructure and services help grow the economy. But Walz said that in his view, the two philosophies fail to solve the debt problem.

He told students that he backs the idea of "pay-as-you-go budgeting" so that every dollar spent has to be offset either by cutting spending or raising revenue. To give students an idea of how decisions to cut taxes or raise revenue affects the budget, he passed out a worksheet where they could make their own decisions.

Students peppered Walz with questions after the presentation. Student Jason Troendle asked how Walz balances the interest of getting re-elected and the interests of the nation?

Walz responded that he believes that "politics needs to be secondary" and that good policies end up being good politically.

Other questions included how the congressman would address the rising cost of Social Security and Medicare, how the government determines how much someone pays in taxes, and what should be done to address the nation's energy needs.

Advance Placement economics teacher Kris Bertelsen said that listening to the congressman helps students understand the real-world impact of fiscal policy.

"They hear me say it, but when they hear an elected official talking about it, it's more real," he said.

In an interview after the assembly, Walz said he's aware that Republicans have criticized his support for the stimulus and the health care bill. He said the health care bill is projected to bring down the deficit in the long term, which is why he supported it. He said he could ask Republicans why they supported eliminating pay-as-you-go budgeting and increasing the debt by not paying for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. But ultimately, Walz said, the two parties need to come together to tackle the growing debt problem.

He added, "If we don't tackle this debt, I don't see how we ever get fiscal responsibility."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bipartisan; debt; students; walz
Since 2007, Democrats have had majorities in Congress, and the debt has went up exponentially.
1 posted on 04/02/2010 3:16:24 AM PDT by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Son House

He said the health care bill is projected to bring down the deficit in the long term, which is why he supported it.

^
Because he voted his constituents to get less income to get that bogus CBO number to brag about

^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2484834/posts

Congressman Walz says, “I said there were a few lines in the sand needed in order for me to support it. It had to have pay-for-value...”

Pay for value refers to geographic disparities in Medicare payments;

For example, hospitals in Minnesota will receive significantly less for doing a procedure than a hospital in New York for doing the exact same thing.


2 posted on 04/02/2010 3:20:04 AM PDT by Son House ("Warning! Warning!" "That does not compute" "Danger, Will Robinson!""Oh, the pain...the pain!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
"he believes it is critical to reach a bipartisan solution on the national debt."

TRANSLATION: "We ran up all this debt, now the Republicans need to come in and clean it all up for us...a bipartisan effort so we can "claim" the Republicans were part of it.".

Like children, every time the dems get into trouble, they start whining for their parents to come and "fix it". When their back is against the wall, they start slinging around the word "bipartisanship"; of course, they had no knowledge of the word when they were huddling behind locked doors dreaming up this concoction they call "obamacare"...no Republican input allowed.

They used the word "bipartisanship" in either of three situations:
1) When campaigning for office;
2) When they are in trouble and need bailing out, or;
3) When they need someone to blame, or to use as "cover" in their risky decisions...like obamacare.

Like drug-induced EEO narcissists, they want to get all the glory, while the GOP takes all the heat and does the heavy lifting.

But, sorry obamabots...you've got this one all to yourself...obamacare is yours, lock, stock, and rationed health care.

November is going to be fun to sit back and watch (after you vote, of course), get plenty of Orville Reddenbacher.
3 posted on 04/02/2010 3:27:22 AM PDT by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

My thoughts exactly. Triple the deficit in one year and then yell for bi-partisanship. Dolts.


4 posted on 04/02/2010 3:32:08 AM PDT by Straight8 (Don't begin it if you're not in it to win it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Let’s see.

A Democrat addressing a major problem that he helped to create. That’s a good start. But, with whom was he talking when this happened? Adults that have the power , vote and pay check? Nope, their kids.

Wonder why? He is a bully, plain and simple. Bullies don’t like facing the results of their activity - they run and hide when forced to do so.

He “held” a meeting about both the debt and “Obamacare” and got publicity. But he did so in the most craven, cowardly manner possible, he spoke to emotional non-voting kids. Wonder what the reaction would have been if he had held it with their parents? Even carefully selected parents would have resulted in a different audience reaction. And he thinks this meeting was a “counter”?

Dimocrats - the party of bullies and cowards!


5 posted on 04/02/2010 3:34:33 AM PDT by Nip (Islam - a religion of piece (your head and life). Truth depends on the spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Of course, there's no secret what this "bipartisan" commission on the national deficit is going to conclude: a VAT in addition to strangling income tax rates.
6 posted on 04/02/2010 3:35:04 AM PDT by Bulldaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Son House

“”When the government spends more money than it takes in, your family pays the price,” the Democrat told students.”
The hypocrites in the dim party are amazing to watch.


7 posted on 04/02/2010 3:37:39 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

What’s the value of bipartisanship when the democrats are always wrong?


8 posted on 04/02/2010 4:01:49 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Obama: Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

He said now is the time for politicians of both parties to work on a solution.

YOU created the problem - YOU solve it. YOU don’t listen - YOU get no help.


9 posted on 04/02/2010 4:12:52 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Yeah, this guy is promoting this very appropriate warning — and then saying this health care bill will bring down the deficit. DOES ANYBODY BELIEVE THESE PEOPLE ANY MORE? DO THEY THINK WE ARE ALL IDIOTS?????


10 posted on 04/02/2010 5:12:14 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Son House
"When the government spends more money than it takes in, your family pays the price," the Democrat told students.

"When the government (Democrats) spends more money than it takes in, your family pays the price." Hey, Walz, you shudda thought about that earlier - YOU spent the money along with your president.

11 posted on 04/02/2010 5:17:24 AM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Walz is on the 2nd tier or vulnerable Dems.

Here are the (R’s) who are running in the primary-huge list. Input on the best R candidate is welcome

MN 1-Tim Walz’ challengers:
Randy Demmer, http://www.demmerforcongress.com/Home.aspx
Jim Engstrand, http://www.jimengstrand.com/
Jim Hagedom, http://www.hagedornforcongress.com/
Allen Quist, http://www.quistforcongress.com/
Carol Molnau, http://www.governor.state.mn.us/welcome/aboutltgovernormolnau/index.htm
Brian Davis
Brad Finstad
Frank McKinzie
Scott Wright

A Master List of vulnerable Dem seats is here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2484540/posts


12 posted on 04/02/2010 6:02:33 AM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Split the country, assign the US debt to the liberal fascists, allowing real Americans to build a new nation debt free.


13 posted on 04/02/2010 6:25:16 AM PDT by rockhardo (Socialism creates its own hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson