Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Kerchief
else you would not tell the lie that a fetus is and infant.

There is no practical difference between the value of a fetus and the value of an infant. If the fetus had no human value I would not oppose abortion. God is quoted that he knew someone BEFORE he was born. John the baptist leaped in the womb when he heard Mary's voice. God is very clear that the unborn are precious to Him and we should have no less respect and honor for the unborn than we do for an infant.

Even if you are an atheist, you must agree that a fetus is not merely a bunch of unorganized worthless flesh.

36 posted on 04/05/2010 4:35:32 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

“There is no practical difference between the value of a fetus and the value of an infant.”

See how you people obfuscate everything. The practical difference is between a fetus and an infant, is not their “value,” but the fact a fetus is not yet born. A fetus is not an infant. You cannot go into a store and find clothing marked “fetus.” Why is that? You not only defy reason, you want to destroy the English language.

I know you have no interest in the fate of the unborn, and are only interested in putting over your political agenda to control others. Why in the world would you want to put the fate of the unborn in the hands of government—and not God? Whose agent are you anyway?

Hank


44 posted on 04/05/2010 6:10:50 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson