Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence That Obama Was Deeply Involved in Socialist New Party “Sister Organization”
NoisyRoom.net ^ | 4-7-2010 | Trevor Loudon

Posted on 04/07/2010 11:07:43 AM PDT by Whenifhow

Did Barack Obama, or someone close to him, deliberately mislead voters about the extent of the US president’s involvement in the socialist Chicago New Party?

In the run up to the November 2008 elections, evidence surfaced that Barack Obama had joined and been endorsed by the Chicago New Party, during his successful 1995/96 Illinois State Senate run.

According to Obama’s “Fight the Smears” website;

Right-wing hatchet man and conspiracy theorist, Stanley Kurtz is pushing a new crackpot smear against Barack falsely claiming he was a member of something called the New Party.

But the truth is Barack has been a member of only one political party, the Democratic Party. In all six primary campaigns of his career, Barack has has run as a Democrat. The New Party did support Barack once in 1996, but he was the only candidate on the ballot in his race and never solicited the endorsement.

Stanley Kurtz also queried Carol Harwell, Obama’s campaign manager at the time: She said

“Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

This despite evidence that Obama was heavily involved in the New Party in 1995 and according to New Party News of Spring 1996, page 1, was a bona fide New Party member.

Snip

It appears beyond doubt that Barack Obama was involved, more than two years before his Illinois State Senate run, with a New Party founded, “sister organization” – Progressive Chicago.

It is clear that ACORN and SEIU played a big role in Progressive Chicago, as did Marxist activists from Democratic Socialists of America and Committees of Correspondence.

(Excerpt) Read more at noisyroom.net ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicago; obama; progressive; socialist
Here is hard evidence that Obama was involved in a New Party “sister organization”, founded by New Party members and run by hard core socialists.

Perhaps some brave journalist might seek redemption and forgiveness from the American people by asking the President some tough questions?

It shouldn’t be too hard. The evidence is all here.

1 posted on 04/07/2010 11:07:44 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Simpleton organizations for simple minds.

The loon is uneducated and socialism is about the only thing he can understand.


2 posted on 04/07/2010 11:11:03 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Did Obama? Did the media? Does a bear?


3 posted on 04/07/2010 11:12:01 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

He was pretending, just to get elected.

He is no longer pretending:

Read this and weep:

Obama was a MARXIST in college, and still is now today.

Here is an interview with a Dr. Drew, PhD -—a fellow student at the time, and therefore it is from someone who knew him very very well:

send to everyone you know if you wish to spread the (blocked) word:

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/13/marxist-obama-why-the-media-has-been-silent/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBGBszZ2Qw0

The full interview is devastating.

Too bad Fox News ignored Dr. Drew in 2008 when he contacted them.

We now know the details of Barry’s Occidental years.

He was an avowed and committed Marxist.

He looked forward to the revolution when the Marxists would overthrow our government.

His love for Marxism was unusually strong.

He looked forward to the revolution when the Marxists would overthrow our government.

His love for Marxism was unusually strong;

He was in passionate agreement with the most radical Marxist Leninist professors.


4 posted on 04/07/2010 11:12:47 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Nice, Progressive Chicago definitely sounds socialist, more so than the vague New Party.

Since it has visual documentation and the progressive tag upon which Glen Beck has been harping, he will soon be all over this with an I-told-you-so expose.

5 posted on 04/07/2010 11:17:51 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; Nachum

duplicate thread with some good links and posts

Obama File 101 -Evidence.. Obama Was Deeply Involved in Socialist New Party “Sister Organization” [Progressive Chicago]
New Zeal ^ | 4/7/10 | Trevor Loudon

Posted on Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:16:30 PM by Nachum
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2488462/posts


6 posted on 04/07/2010 12:28:07 PM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

We all know Obama was and lies.


7 posted on 04/07/2010 12:33:29 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Warmer... warmer... you’re getting warmer...
8 posted on 04/07/2010 12:38:11 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Right-wing hatchet man and conspiracy theorist, Stanley Kurtz is pushing a new crackpot smear against Barack falsely claiming

Hmmmm.... Kurtz must be onto something. The vitriol gives it away...

9 posted on 04/07/2010 12:39:26 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
New Party prefers to function in the background. Google ‘em up...
10 posted on 04/07/2010 12:40:29 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
I am shocked!


11 posted on 04/07/2010 12:41:08 PM PDT by McGruff (Don't criticize. Explain to me who I should support other than Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
In an interview with Harry Smith recently ,,, 0bamster said he blamed limbaugh and beck and other conserv. talkers for labeling him of being a socialist .

Yesterday Glen Beck showed his viewing audience all the past and present socialist influences that HE HAS SURROUNDED HIMSELF with .

President Bamster ,,,, you don't want to take on GLEN BECK ,,, he has all the facts to back up his claims and a multitude of video soundbites of you and your socialist comrades boasting of socialism or communism idealogy .

12 posted on 04/07/2010 1:02:14 PM PDT by lionheart 247365 (-:{ GLEN BECK is 0bama's TRANSPARENCY CZAR }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

mmm


13 posted on 04/07/2010 1:47:02 PM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm
Sorry about the duplicate. Did a search, sometimes it doesn't catch it.

Won't feel guilty this time though :)

14 posted on 04/07/2010 2:18:53 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Won’t feel guilty this time though :)”

I think duplicates are a good thing (don’t tell mods :))-— often they are posted at different time of day or even different days, different people commenting and adding to research, etc-—I just like to see them linked for those same reasons.


15 posted on 04/07/2010 2:24:17 PM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

BTW: I forgot to mention, the thread I linked to was LOCKED. You were the first. Your posting record remains unblemished. :)


16 posted on 04/07/2010 2:26:36 PM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Nevermind...Got mixed up with wheniflow. Your record is blemished with the mods but A+ in my book. :)


17 posted on 04/07/2010 2:29:59 PM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

Is there a FReeper form of zit-cream for my blemishes? :)


18 posted on 04/07/2010 2:46:20 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

bump


19 posted on 04/07/2010 2:49:15 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Bump for anyone in talk radio doing show prep.


20 posted on 04/07/2010 9:07:00 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson