To: stevie_d_64
just think of how things could have been different if 0 had not been elected. we were very close to removing the tyranny of the SC lefties. What a blown opportunity.
7 posted on
04/09/2010 7:46:45 AM PDT by
jtal
To: jtal
Lessee. McCain names "moderates," who then are stonewalled by the Dem majority in the Senate, so he backs down and names even more "moderate" people.
I don't care if it's Stevens or Ginzy: a liberal=a radical. The #s are all that matter, and with McCain, we still wouldn't have gotten any different outcomes.
16 posted on
04/09/2010 7:49:29 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: jtal
Believe me, they would not be retiring if a Republican were President. Souter and Stevens were traitors to the bitter end.
49 posted on
04/09/2010 8:10:44 AM PDT by
MBB1984
To: jtal
I keep thinking about all those people who refused to vote for McCain and stayed home. Think they’ll vote next time?
To: jtal
Who do you think named Stevens? Ford, a liberal Republican.
182 posted on
04/09/2010 5:56:22 PM PDT by
Luke21
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson