Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stupak Finally Gets It -- Votes Have Consequences (One Rat down, 250 more to go)
Fox News ^ | 4/10/2010 | Marjorie Dannenfelser

Posted on 04/10/2010 9:25:25 AM PDT by tobyhill

Today, Rep. Bart Stupak understands what our group's polling revealed: a vote for Obama's health care bill was a vote against the will of his constituents. Yet he chose to do it anyway and now he is suffering the consequences.

In the final hours of the health care debate, Americans across the country were deeply saddened when Rep. Stupak (D-Mich.) and a handful of “pro-life” Democrats buckled under White House pressure and voted for legislation that will lead to the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade.

Their cover was a fig leaf -- an Executive Order signed by President Obama that addresses none of the authentic pro-life concerns of the American people. Rather than stand up for the pro-Life American majority Stupak and his gang caved.

Before his fateful vote, Rep. Stupak had been a national pro-Life leader who championed the unborn and their mothers. The Susan B. Anthony List had even planned to honor him with our Defender of Life award. The decision to leave office makes it clear that, finally, Stupak understands: Votes have consequences.

In the days leading up to the health care vote our polling in the first district of Michigan showed that 78 percent of Stupak’s constituents said they opposed taxpayer funding of abortion. Stupak understands now what the polling revealed: a vote for that bill was a vote against the will of his constituents. Yet he chose to do it and now he is suffering the consequences.

Earlier this week the Susan B. Anthony List launched a grassroots campaign of radio and automated phone calls in the districts of “pro-life” Democrats, including Rep. Stupak, who voted ‘”Yes” on the health care bill to inform their constituents that their representatives’ vote for the bill was a vote for taxpayer funding of abortion.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; seeya; stupak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2010 9:25:25 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Bart Stupak LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVES dead babies.


2 posted on 04/10/2010 9:28:23 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9c/TeddyVWad.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

After Stupak and Ben Nelson we can say there is no such thing as a pro life Democrat.

After the Healthcare vote, we can say there isn’t a Democrat that is not a Socialist.


3 posted on 04/10/2010 9:29:24 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

He is done.

His wife is now packing their bags to move. He isn’t safe where he lives. Poor little bitty abortion guy......how about Florida?


4 posted on 04/10/2010 9:29:59 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Count two congressional democrats down in Michigan. 1st and 7th district. Don’t know about the others.


5 posted on 04/10/2010 9:31:31 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Speaking of “Executive Orders”, and these are extreme, extreme, extreme cases I’m suggesting:

Could a president sign an EO dissolving the Constitution?

Or dissolve the Congress and/or Supreme Court?

What are the limits on EO’s? And can the Congress or SCOTUS overturn them?


6 posted on 04/10/2010 9:31:32 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Welcome to the wonderful world of StupaKare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Maybe he should move to NYC. After all, it worked for Hillary.


7 posted on 04/10/2010 9:31:47 AM PDT by avoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The sad thing is, now they can run a Democrat who states he has heard the public, and many fools will buy off on the promise.

This is a last ditch attempt to save the Democrat majority from certain destruction.

I laughed when I heard that report that Obama had personally asked Stupak not to resign. My take on it is that a horse head showed up in Stupak’s bead with a note from Il Douche’ Junior reading, “You may want to resign..., health considerations for your family and all.”


8 posted on 04/10/2010 9:32:12 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Be still & kneel before the all knowing/seeing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr. blessings be upon him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

He’s got to retire so that Obama can vacate the executive order with fewer repercussions in the House.


9 posted on 04/10/2010 9:32:15 AM PDT by Ingtar (Congress: proof that Entropy trumps Evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

he sold out the country for a small airport...I absolutely have no pity for the bastard.


10 posted on 04/10/2010 9:33:33 AM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
No, he still doesn't get it.
These snakes think that they will be rewarded with a nice comfortable rock somewhere, under which they can hide with a cushy job financed by the US taxpayers, and be out of sight enjoying the fruits of his RICO activities.

Ain't gonna happen. He will be in someone's spotlight forever.

He didn't have the good sesnse to just STFU and go away.

11 posted on 04/10/2010 9:33:49 AM PDT by Publius6961 (10% of muslims, the killer murdering radicals, are "only" 140,000,000 of 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Life is difficult. It’s even more difficult when you are Stupak.


12 posted on 04/10/2010 9:35:23 AM PDT by BenKenobi ("we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“Pro-Life voters in the first district of Michigan and across the country deserve a member, Democrat or Republican, who will put pro-Life over party.”

The author still just does not get it.

And I’m not “pro-life”, just anti-Roe v. Wade.


13 posted on 04/10/2010 9:36:20 AM PDT by mike-zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
“No, he still doesn't get it.
These snakes think that they will be rewarded with a nice comfortable rock somewhere, under which they can hide with a cushy job financed by the US taxpayers, and be out of sight enjoying the fruits of his RICO activities.
Ain't gonna happen. He will be in someone’s spotlight forever.”

It would be nice if politicians had some kind of price to pay for the evil the do.

14 posted on 04/10/2010 9:39:17 AM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Would that be Bart "the liberal tool" Stup(id)ak?

No Liberal Tools
15 posted on 04/10/2010 9:40:46 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

My bet is that Obama promised him something...I doubt it is because he knows he would lose an election


16 posted on 04/10/2010 9:41:50 AM PDT by Moby Grape (Formerly Impeach the Boy...name change necessary after the Marxist won)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Stupak is as Stupak does. (or something like that)


17 posted on 04/10/2010 9:42:06 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Too soon old,
Too late smart.


18 posted on 04/10/2010 9:42:13 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 443 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
Could a president sign an EO dissolving the Constitution?

Or dissolve the Congress and/or Supreme Court?

Stick around, we'll find out shortly...

19 posted on 04/10/2010 9:43:35 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 443 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
What are the limits on EO’s? And can the Congress or SCOTUS overturn them?

Doesn't matter what the Congress does; they are toast, and a major cause of the Constitutional crisis facing us (how many tricky ways can we find around the Constitution?).

The Supreme Court is another matter... if the SCOTUS makes a decision which is ignored by both POTUS and Congress in today's political climate, the resulting popular explosion will drive the overeaching 'social justice progressives' underground for another three generations.

At least the survivors...

Transform America? Rewrite our history? Good luck with that.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact, subject to a bought 'popular' vote.

20 posted on 04/10/2010 9:43:50 AM PDT by Publius6961 (10% of muslims, the killer murdering radicals, are "only" 140,000,000 of 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson