To: Christian_Capitalist
You also keep saying that yer gonna vote for Kokesh if it somes down to Kokesh vs anyone
I am going to refuse to vote for someone like that, no matter what.
We are NOT required to vote, and if the vote is between two complete losers, I am not going to vote for a traitor to keep party unity or whatever
135 posted on
04/12/2010 1:59:36 PM PDT by
RaceBannon
(RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
To: RaceBannon
You also keep saying that yer gonna vote for Kokesh if it somes down to Kokesh vs anyone I am going to refuse to vote for someone like that, no matter what. We are NOT required to vote, and if the vote is between two complete losers, I am not going to vote for a traitor to keep party unity or whateverThat's fine. I respect your point of view.
In the meantime, however -- I expect that Mullins will win the GOP nomination, not Kokesh, so it will be a moot point anyway.
To: RaceBannon
And incidentally, if Tom Mullins (who is a good Pro-Life, Fiscal Conservative, Anti-War Republican himself) should win the GOP Nomination, and Adam Kokesh mounts an Independent "spoiler campaign" against him...
...Then I will happily join you in smearing Kokesh into the dirt, on the very grounds of party unity which you dismiss as unimportant.
But hopefully, Mullins will win the nomination handily, and Kokesh will shut up and go away. OR demonstrate that he's going to be a good "team player" Republican, and urge his supporters to vote for Tom Mullins -- like a good Republican should, in respect to a decent Republican Primary opponent.**
** -- (But I confess that I'm not holding my breath on that, because I suspect that Kokesh may be more of an attention-whore than a team-player. I guess we'll find out).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson