Replies

The accounts in the media of the reaction to them relfects questionable judgement in that reaction.

I would agree that the media always has an agenda and rarely is objective.

I was not there, I pretend no knowledge of what was said nor that which was done, nor of the protocols for handling such instances, but the appearance the media gives is that the choices were of questionable nature.

I would suggest watching the documentary "Deliver Us from Evil". I'm sure it's not totally objective, but there is a lot of well documented information.

It's the cover up that makes this so bad.

To present a gay-infused and often atheistic media as an unbiased attacker would be disingenious indeed.

I wouldn't disagree. However, there are so many other places to go to get information about this that some facts are well established.

Regardless, I am not willing to toss two thousand years of the Church out the window over this. Nor will I villify the Pope. Errors in judgement in the past will be remediated by changes in policy in the future--more than I can say for the secular environment.

What I do see are the perverts of the MSM gleefully demanding that the Church be villified and attacking the Pope, when they probably shouldn't be in the rock throwing business.