Posted on 04/11/2010 5:19:36 PM PDT by STARWISE
I think you may be right. I believe that Bush had some of his executive orders revoked by President Obama. I just can’t believe that the President can do this. I mean I don’t praise President Bush for his 280 Executive Orders. I don’t care if it took him eight years...that is too many. President Obama has had 50 in one year...if he is president, he will have signed approximately 400 if he keeps up his signing. I say do away with Executive Orders for all Presidents.
Yes it reminds me of President Bush in the same predicament. Can you imagine that we had the majority for SIX years and he got nothing done. It is stunning but it must be very difficult to get things done...that could be a good thing. lol.
Well, it was a nice try.
Do over.
CIRCA Sept 15, 2009 A SHOCKING DISPLAY OF OBAMA'S THIRST FOR POWER
FOX News' Judge Napolitano notes: if implemented, the unconstitutional proposals Obama urged in his Sept 2009 speech to Wall Street will amount to a final coup d’état by banksters, their technocrats and enforcers, at the Federal Reserve (*the privately-held bankster cartel that masquerades as a government agency).
Obama's "reforms" would install a dictatorial regulatory power controlled by international bankers over the entire US economy — down to the local grocer and hot dog vendor on the corner.
It will control our lives down to the smallest detail. It will require us to ask permission for the most mundane and routine of financial transactions. IT MUST BE BE RESISTED AT ALL COSTS. VIDEO LINK AVAILABLE Judge Andrew Napolitano On Obama/Bankster Takeover
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.