Posted on 04/13/2010 3:27:22 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
Do Weaver and Cameron have something on the side going on?
Ben-Hur? One of the greatest scripts ever filmed? A breathtaking epic with deep religious meaning. She compares THAT to the drivel of Avatar, a special-effects-driven mess of a script? The effects were incredible. The story left NO ONE satisfied. What arrogance. And did Cameron really "direct" it, or did the WETA programmers? Hurt Locker's script was outstanding. And the director with "breasts" also filmed "Point Break", a great underrated testosterone-fueled action flick. What an absurd insult to a great director Bigelow.
Although I enjoyed the special effects, I found Avatar to be simplistic, poorly written, and predictable. From start to finish it was littered with typical liberal sterotypes of the heros and villians.
Halfway thru the movie I turned to my wife and said, “The military man will be killed by an arrow.”
Liberals are childlike in their thinking.
My daughter still insists it was Ferngully.
“Jim didn’t have breasts...”
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I feel like I am in a time warp.
I still hear the fems ‘-itchin’ that
SHE
“Didn’t win because she HAS breasts”
Will these fools EVER be satisfied? s/s/
Sutton was actually in the Army and participated in a number of amphibious landings inthe Pacific.
“Those are pics of Sigourney in a wonder bra. Doesn’t count.”
Works for me. To Hell with “lifts and separates.”
I tried to watch Avatar, but the cartoon before the movie was almost three hours long and I didn’t stick around for the feature.
Um, Sigourney, maybe AVATAR lost because it had a derivative script, wooden acting(including yours), and clunky dialogue. The only saving grace were the visuals, which will be forgotten in a few years when even greater spectacles are produced.
Been out in the world much, Phil ???
This is a common ‘troll’ management tactic. Anything you post on the first day you sign up is going to be reviewed.
If you’re NOT a troll, then ‘no harm, no foul’. If you are, you’ll just have to work at it a little harder.
Oh, BTW — Welcome to FR. I think ...
One man’s opinion ...
21stCenturion
Sigourney is wrong. James Cameron does have breasts, but just like every other man’s breasts they are not functional.
If if were the GOVERNMENT reviewing your comment before it is posted, then you might have a point. But since it is the OWNER OF THIS FORUM (or his designee) reviewing your comment, then your point is fallacious. Welcome to FR. You might want to establish your conservative credentials before you start accusing your host of being a nanny-stater just because he uses a preview process before allowing your comments to be posted.
I LOL every time this is posted!!! :D
LOL! Ferngully...kids are awfully astute on occasion, when their heads haven’t been pre-filled with mush!
True, that.
Actually, I think Cameron DOES have breasts, doesn’t he? (not that there’s anything WRONG with that)
That is hilarious!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.