Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
Good, so you can explain how the paper grew?? The image below has the original scan pasted over top of one of the factlack photos. Notice how much extra margin there is outside the security border on the factlack document, yet you can see where the edge of the paper stops on the Obama scan.

LOL. Are you serious? I can't believe you couldn't to figure this one out for yourself. But apparently you couldn't, so let me lay it out for you.

No, paper doesn't grow, but scan images can be resized. If you scan a paper that doesn't precisely fit some pre-specified dimensions, the scanner will shrink and resize the image to fit. If the proportions have to be changed, the scanner will distort the image.

Really, this isn't complicated.

There are legal limitations on when and how this can be done. Otherwise one is committing fraud.

I see. So it's possible that Obama's step father committed fraud when he as 6 or 7 years old. How exactly is this relevant to his eligbility to be president?

1,173 posted on 04/17/2010 12:28:37 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
No, paper doesn't grow, but scan images can be resized. If you scan a paper that doesn't precisely fit some pre-specified dimensions, the scanner will shrink and resize the image to fit. If the proportions have to be changed, the scanner will distort the image.

Dude, just tell me you don't have a clue and spare yourself some embarrassment. This wasn't a result of being resized. Even it was resized, it doesn't explain why the edge of the paper is cut off, but not cut off at the edge of the jpg. The white strip around the document shows where the edge of the paper is at. Sorry, the obvious cause is that this not the same document factlack claimed to photograph. Whatever they photographed was most likely a print-out of the original forgery onto newly acquired certificate paper.

I see. So it's possible that Obama's step father committed fraud when he as 6 or 7 years old. How exactly is this relevant to his eligbility to be president?

Sure, it's possible Lolo committed fraud, but what would be the motive?? Obama has lots of motives for committing fraud, but as for Lolo, not so much.

1,174 posted on 04/17/2010 5:35:29 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson