Posted on 04/13/2010 12:37:13 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Except for Kentucky Right to Life.
If you were brighter then you would have noticed that the post at stormfront was a screen shot from freerepublic, you didn’t have to click on anything to see that.
You just are not good at reading posts and people.
If you read the screenshot, there was no vitriol directed at you. None. At all. Zero.
In fact, by the comment they chose to quote, they were only aware of the post because it was pinged to you.
Dick Cheney, Bill Clinton and Mitt Romney all support homosexualizing the military, Grayson has endorsed Romney and Clinton, voted for Bill Clinton and been endorsed by Dick Cheney.
Social conservatives in Kentucky have rejected Trey Grayson, is that why you support him, because you think that Freud would find fault with conservative Republicans?
Except Kentucky Right to Life.
Posting a link on freerepublic does not notify the other forum that their link was posted here, they saw that because they were on our threads here.
They were in a frenzy because some of us were attacking stormfront and they were signing up, spamming us, trying to hijack threads here, and freerepublic had hell with them for a short time, some of us were involved in that heated period
Paul leads Grayson among pro-lifers by a 50%-32% margin. Grayson leads Paul among pro-abortion Republicans by a 42%-27% margin.
Paul does best among self-described conservative Republicans. Grayson does best vs. Paul among self-described liberal Republicans.
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=1976231a-b3ad-4309-aa16-197b8d3c072d
Yeah, not much to cling to when the state’s pro life voters and church goers figure that that organization made a mistake and rejected him, and the only portion of Republican voters that Grayson is getting support from are the pro abortion Republicans that didn’t make much of the endorsement either.
Absolutely. Unless the poster here is a poster there.
But that wouldn't be the case here, of course. I'm just observing that there was no vitriol on that post. Sorry. There wasn't.
Maybe he can run to AIG lobbyists for another bailout fundraiser? His campaign looks like it needs a bailout pretty badly right now.
I looked it up. I’ll let lurkers decide for themselves which is the real organization.
Right to life of Northern Kentucky’s website: http://nkyrtl.org/
Kentucky right to life association’s website: http://www.krla.org/
I’d take my grandma’s bridge club’s endorsement more seriously than nkyrtl.org’s.
Or maybe real activists know that Rand Paul’s schtick is a sham.
Remember Debra Medina? I do.
Evidently you were not involved with our famous stormfront assault period when they were all over us with new sign ups, and they were being banned left and right, that is who was reporting back to home base, that freeper posted the link to me because of the level of my attack on stormfront, not because I was being so gentle on them.
I don’t support the homosexual agenda either.
Try and force yourself to read post 127 and confront what you are supporting, and the nature of the voters who agree, and disagree with your choice.
All kinds of moronic pretend Buchananite Paultards have been infesting this site since the '10 campaign season began. Welcome.
Obama gave us Nationalized Healthcare, and you want to run down a solid conservative like Mitch McConnell who voted against it all the way down the line...you're a phony conservative, a Democrat enabler and a fellow traveler with Stormfront.
The truth sucks sometimes...especially yours.
Yes I wear the scars I recieved from the pro Medina crowd.
The conservative voters have seen through Trey Grayson.
“Paul leads Grayson among pro-lifers by a 50%-32% margin. Grayson leads Paul among pro-abortion Republicans by a 42%-27% margin.”
“Paul does best among self-described conservative Republicans. Grayson does best vs. Paul among self-described liberal Republicans.”
Mitch McConnell voted for the bailout. Nice try.
Oh, yes, I read each and every thread. Because I'm that kind of guy.
You provided "evidence", called me an idiot for observing that your evidence wasn't evidence of anything and now are expecting me to read the entire forum myself.
I don’t support the homosexual agenda either.
Yeah, you keep saying that. I can't help wondering why. I read the posts in this thread at least and the evidence that Grayson is such a liberal is that you say so. If your own brain is good enough for you, then I guess it must be good enough for me.
Oh, yeah, defender of the Paulestinians is a real warrior on this score.
You really are thick, actually you are a shallow liar and thick, I don’t support Ron Paul and never have, I carry more scars from the pro Ron Paul crowd than I do from the Medina crowd.
But you are supporting Trey Grayson.
“Paul leads Grayson among pro-lifers by a 50%-32% margin. Grayson leads Paul among pro-abortion Republicans by a 42%-27% margin.”
“Paul does best among self-described conservative Republicans. Grayson does best vs. Paul among self-described liberal Republicans.”
Nice try, N00b.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.