To: DallasDeb; nolongerademocrat; silverleaf; Touch Not the Cat; Cousin Eddie; Drew68; bert; ...
First of all, the Army only has to make the charge that the Lt Col refused a lawful order. It is up to the LT Col’s counsel to request the birth certificate.
Second, it is highly unusual for a judge to refuse documents that would exonerate an individual, especially if the documents in question are key to the defense of the accused. Defense simply requests the BC and the judge issues a court order to the state of Hawaii to release it.
383 posted on
04/14/2010 3:07:50 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
.......It is up to the LT Cols counsel to request the birth certificate......
I don’t pretend to be a military lawyer but......
The very concept of chain of command is at issue. The head of the chain of command must be proved valid. Every order by every officer goes to the very top. No valid top, no valid chain
394 posted on
04/14/2010 3:29:19 PM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Good, thanks for the info.
395 posted on
04/14/2010 3:32:39 PM PDT by
nolongerademocrat
("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
To: Blood of Tyrants
So the judge does,in fact,deny any motion made by the defense.He's found guilty,given a sentence and his lawyers appeal.Hussein's stooges at the DoD and the Department of Just Us see to it that these appeals take years.Hussein's out of office before the appeals are finally decided.
Although I'm not a lawyer that's the worst case scenario for Hussein and the best case scenario for the Colonel....IMO.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Thanks Blood of Tyrants. I agree.
506 posted on
04/15/2010 9:42:48 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Be still & kneel before the know-nothing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr., may fleas be upon him.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson