Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: danamco; Mr Rogers

He believes that the court made a ruling when they didn’t even hear the case. According to Mr Rogers, refusing to hear the case is the same as issuing a ruling.


51 posted on 04/16/2010 7:30:29 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

He is nothing but a Pinhead!!!


54 posted on 04/16/2010 7:42:49 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36

“According to Mr Rogers, refusing to hear the case is the same as issuing a ruling.”

If a court believes there is no legal basis for a case, they do not hear it anyways - they toss it out. That is what the US Supreme Court did with the case challenging Obama’s election based on his father’s Kenyan citizenship - they took it to conference and there were not 4 justices who thought it worth pursuing. So they rejected it.

Why do YOU think they denied the case a hearing? Indigestion? Didn’t like the winter weather in DC? Thought it wasn’t important to have a Constitutionally qualified President?


56 posted on 04/16/2010 7:48:04 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson