Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China: It has been the hottest major export market for U.S. companies for the last decade.
LA Times ^ | April 15, 2009 | Daniel Griswold

Posted on 04/16/2010 8:23:34 PM PDT by thewoodwardreport.com

The U.S. Treasury Department wisely delayed its semiannual report on global exchange rates so that more sensible heads can prevail before we stumble into a trade fight with China.

The congressionally mandated report surveys exchange rates and other indicators of the global economy and determines whether any U.S. trading partners are guilty of "currency manipulation." Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner announced this month that he would delay the scheduled April 15 release to give more time to negotiate with top Chinese officials. President Obama's meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao in Washington this week brought no breakthrough, but it did raise expectations that China will soon allow its currency to resume appreciating.

Among the less sensible heads are 130 members of Congress who wrote to Geithner last month demanding tough action against China. They argued that Beijing has artificially depressed the value of its currency to promote its goods in other markets and discourage exports to China.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; exports; finance

1 posted on 04/16/2010 8:23:35 PM PDT by thewoodwardreport.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thewoodwardreport.com
"determines whether any U.S. trading partners are guilty of "currency manipulation." Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner announced this month that he would delay the scheduled April 15 release to give more time to negotiate with top Chinese officials"

What's to negotiate, ether they are or they aren't. I was always lead to believe the truth not negotiated.
2 posted on 04/16/2010 8:27:18 PM PDT by JoSixChip (It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thewoodwardreport.com

Okay, fine—the “hottest” export market. But we are still trading at a loss. So...what am I missing?


3 posted on 04/16/2010 8:28:08 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

What we have been exporting is our means of production.

Entire factories have been shipped lock, stock and barrel to commie China.


4 posted on 04/16/2010 8:51:03 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 449 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thewoodwardreport.com

This article is unreal, talking about China being our “hottest” export market, and those monster ag numbers up to $13.8 billion. But why not look at the total picture for 2009:

Exports to China $69,576,000,000
Imports from China 296,402,000,000

Trade Deficit 226,826,000,000

Oh, yeah, a trade war with China would just kill us. Who has the most to lose here?

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2009


5 posted on 04/16/2010 8:55:19 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thewoodwardreport.com
The U.S. Treasury Department wisely delayed its semiannual report on global exchange rates so that more sensible heads can prevail before we stumble into a trade fight with China.

I do not care what one thinks of our trad policies with China. The US Treasury department has information that it is required to release, and it has chosen not to do so. Usually, the sharing of data helps conflicting sides to resolve problems. Geithner is hiding data so that the "correct" solution cannot be reached.

But that is par for the administration.

6 posted on 04/16/2010 10:10:44 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
I do not care what one thinks of our trad policies with China.

Really?...Look, why don't we just get down to brass tacks here and admit that the real issue to be discussed is whether or not China is manipulating their currency.

7 posted on 04/16/2010 10:29:16 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"What we have been exporting is our means of production.

Entire factories have been shipped lock, stock and barrel to commie China.

Exactly! America has stupidly transferred it's industrial know-how to the Chi-Coms and received nothing but an ultra high deficit in its balance of trade with the Chi-Coms. Meanwhile, China expands it military and threatens to nuke LA when ever their Chi-Com butts itch.

8 posted on 04/16/2010 10:50:36 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
Really?...

My point for posting was to point out that the Treasury was once again not doing its job. It is hard to have a debate when the Treasury is withholding key information.

9 posted on 04/17/2010 4:44:19 AM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thewoodwardreport.com

The Liberal Globalists will spin anything.....when you have a massive trade deficit with one country...you still are not exporting enough.

Love it when Liberal Globalists spin.....they spin more because people are waking up to the failure of Liberal Statist Free Trade Globalists.


10 posted on 04/17/2010 6:05:16 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD Hayworth for Senate ..... jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson