Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AZ-Sen. 2010: McCain to Obama: Send troops to border if you don't like new immigration law
The Hill, Washington, DC ^ | 2010-04-24 | Ian Swanson

Posted on 04/24/2010 12:34:54 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: rabscuttle385

uuuuh riiiiiiiiiight McCain. we really REALLY belive you lol!


41 posted on 04/24/2010 2:42:49 PM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Is there anyone — anyone at all — stupid enough to be fooled by this?


42 posted on 04/24/2010 2:48:50 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (First, they sell their soul. Then they lose their mind. (This tagline dedicated to Juan McCain))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Oh, my Amnesty McCain is suddenly so worried about the borders. If this were not so maddening it would be funny.


43 posted on 04/24/2010 2:56:11 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Palin/Hunter 2012 -- Bolton their Secretary of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll; sirchtruth
What would be horrifying is if this isn’t an act

It is an act- the good cop, bad cop act.

Schmucky Schumer and Juan McLame are the designated bad cops this week, in an attempt by the regime to assuage public opinion, which their internals are telling them is off the boards on the Israel and immigration issues.

None of what either of these actors are saying will impact the regime's policies.
44 posted on 04/24/2010 3:23:58 PM PDT by Canedawg (I'm not digging this tyranny thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

He must really believe we are stoopid.


45 posted on 04/24/2010 4:09:14 PM PDT by FatherofFive (0bama is dangerous and must be stopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

A detailed history of McCain voting JUST on amnesty

2007: Voted on Senate floor in favor of motion to invoke cloture on S. 1639, a bill to reward illegal aliens with amnesty Sen.
McCain voted in favor of a second motion to invoke cloture on S. 1639 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Edward Kennedy),
a bill to reward up to 6 million illegal aliens with amnesty. The motion to invoke cloture would have limited further debate on the bill and moved it to a final vote. A vote for cloture was effectively a vote in favor of passing the amnesty-guestworker bill. The motion to invoke cloture failed by a vote of 46 to 53.

2007: Voted on Senate floor in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens Sen. McCain voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture on S. 1639 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Edward Kennedy), a bill to reward illegal aliens with amnesty. The motion to invoke cloture was a move to initiate debate on the proposal and limit further discussion of amendments to a previously-agreed upon set of proposals — thus a vote against cloture was effectively a vote in favor of killing the amnesty-guestworker bill. The motion to invoke cloture passed by a vote of 64 to 35.

2007: Voted on Senate floor against reducing amnesties for illegal aliens Sen. McCain voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture on the substitute amendment (SA 1150) to S. 1348, a bill to reward illegal aliens with amnesty. The motion to invoke cloture would have ended debate on the proposal and limited further discussion of amendments to a previously-agreed upon set of proposals — thus a vote in favor of cloture was effectively a vote in favor of the amnesty-guestworker bill. The motion to invoke cloture failed by a vote of 45 to 50.

2007: Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to create a disincentive to apply for amnesty Sen. McCain voted in favor of the Cornyn Amendment (SA 1250) to S. 1348 to discourage applicants from applying for amnesty by eliminating the provisions protecting the confidentiality of the information contained in amnesty applications and, instead, requires the sharing of application-related information upon the request of a law enforcement agency, intelligence, or national security agency, or DHS component when requested in connection with a duly-authorized investigation of a civil violation. The Cornyn Amendment passed by a vote of 57 to 39.

2007: Voted on Senate floor against amendment to bar certain criminals from amnesty Sen. McCain voted against the Cornyn Amendment (SA 1184) to S. 1385 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Harry Reid) to bar criminal aliens from receiving amnesty. Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff has estimated that 15% of illegal aliens are criminals. The Cornyn Amendment failed by a vote of 46 to 51.

2007: Voted against amendment to strip amnesty provisions from S. 1348 in 2007 Sen. McCain voted against the Vitter Amendment to strip the amnesty provisions from S. 1348 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Harry Reid). The Vitter Amendment failed by a vote of 29 to 66.

2007: Cosponsoring S. 774 to reward illegal aliens with amnesty S. 774 (whose main sponsor is Sen. Dick Durbin) would reward illegal aliens under the age of 21 who have been physically present in the country for five years and are in 7th grade or above with amnesty. An estimated 500,000 to 600,000 illegal aliens would qualify for this amnesty.

2007: Cosponsoring S. 340 to grant amnesty to illegal aliens (AgJOBS) Sen. McCain is a cosponsor of S. 340 (whose main sponsor is Sen. Dianne Feinstein) to encourage more illegal immigration by rewarding certain illegal aliens who work in agriculture with amnesty.

2006: Voted on Senate floor in favor of S. 2611 to reward illegal aliens with amnesty Sen. McCain voted in favor of final passage of S. 2611 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Arlen Specter) which includes an amnesty (both immediate and deferred) for 10.2 million illegal aliens (6.7 million illegal alien workers and 3.5 million illegal alien spouses and/children). S. 2611 passed by a vote of 62 to 36.

2006: Voted in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens Sen. McCain voted in favor of a motion to invoke cloture on S. 2611 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Arlen Specter) which includes an amnesty (both immediate and deferred) for 10.2 million illegal aliens (6.7 million illegal alien workers and 3.5 million illegal alien spouses and/children). The motion to invoke cloture passed by a vote of 73 to 25.

2006: Voted against amendment to reward 2 million illegal aliens with amnesty Sen. McCain voted against the Feinstein Amendment to S. 2611 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Arlen Specter) to create an “orange card” that would allow an estimated two million illegal aliens to pay a fine, and after 6-8 years, adjust to Lawful Permanent Resident status. The Feinstein Amendment failed by a vote of 37 to 61 .

2006: Voted against amendment to kill amnesty provisions Sen. McCain voted against the Vitter amendment (SA 3963) to S. 2611 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Arlen Specter) to remove provisions authorizing the “earned legalization” and “agricultural worker” amnesty schemes that would grant amnesty to an estimated 16 million illegal aliens and their families (according to a May, 2006 study by the Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector). The Vitter amendment failed by a vote of 33 to 66.

2006: Voted against procedural move to reward illegal aliens with amnesty Sen. McCain voted against cloture on SA 3424, a “compromise amnesty” proposal by Sens. Hagel (R-NE) and Martinez (R-FL). The purpose of voting against allowing a final vote on this proposal varied from Senator to Senator, with many of them favoring the proposal but not willing to bring it up without a lot of votes on amendments. At the least, those voting against cloture were insisting on a chance for opponents of the bill to make their case with amendments. The Hagel-Martinez proposal would reward illegal aliens with amnesty. S. 2611 includes an amnesty (both immediate and deferred) for 10.2 million illegal aliens (6.7 million illegal alien workers and 3.5 million illegal alien spouses and/children). The cloture motion failed by a vote of 38 to 60.

2005-2006: Cosponsored S. 2075 to reward illegal aliens with amnesty S. 2075 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Dick Durbin) would reward illegal aliens under the age of 21 who have been physically present in the country for five years and are in 7th grade or above with amnesty. An estimated 500,000 to 600,000 illegal aliens would qualify for this amnesty. The bill died in the Judiciary Committee.

2005-2006: Cosponsored S. 1033 to reward illegal aliens with amnesty Sen. McCain was a cosponsor of S. 1033 to reward virtually all illegal aliens (except those with criminal records or terrorist connections) with amnesty. This could potentially reward 9 million illegal aliens with amnesty. This bill died in the Judiciary Committee.

2005: Voted in favor of amnesty for agricultural workers Sen. McCain voted to invoke cloture, a procedural move requiring 60 votes to limit debate and ensure a vote on the AgJOBS amnesty amendment for up to 3 million illegal aliens, introduced by Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), to the Iraq supplemental spending bill. The Senate voted 53 to 45 not to invoke cloture, effectively keeping the amnesty off of the final bill.

2005-2006: Cosponsored S. 359 to grant amnesty to illegal aliens Sen. McCain was a cosponsor of S. 359 to encourage more illegal immigration by rewarding certain illegal aliens who work in agriculture with amnesty.

2003-2004: Cosponsored S. 1645 to grant amnesty to illegal aliens Sen. McCain cosponsored S. 1645 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Larry Craig) to encourage more illegal immigration by rewarding certain illegal aliens who work in agriculture with amnesty. This bill died in the Judiciary Committee.

2003-2004: Cosponsored S. 1545 to reward illegal aliens with amnesty S. 1545 would have rewarded illegal aliens under the age of 21 who have been physically present in the country for five years and are in 7th grade or above with amnesty. An estimated 500,000 to 600,000 illegal aliens would have qualified for this amnesty.

2003-2004: Cosponsored S. 1461 to encourage reward illegal aliens with amnesty Sen. McCain cosponsored S. 1461, to create a legalization process for almost all illegal aliens who will then be eligible for green cards after 6 years. Amnesty has been shown to increase rates of illegal immigration. The bill did not come to a vote.

2000: Voted against an illegal immigration amnesty. Sen. McCain voted against including an amnesty for illegal aliens from Central America in the Senate H-1B bill (S.2045). This not necessarily a vote against the amnesty, but rather a vote against including it in the H-1B legislation. The move to attach the amnesty failed 43-55.

1997: Voted for an amnesty to illegal aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba. Sen. McCain voted for a procedural move that helped allow the Mack Amendment to be included in S.1156 (the District of Columbia Appropriations bill). This amendment granted amnesty to illegal aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba and is expected to add close to one million people to U.S. population. 96 N/A N/A

1990: Voted for a bill that included an amnesty. Sen. McCain supported S.358 (whose main sponsor was Sen. Edward Kennedy), which provided an amnesty for up to 165,000 spouses and minor children of illegal aliens who were granted amnesty in 1986. Ultimately, the 1990 bill passed 81-17.


46 posted on 04/24/2010 6:29:16 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain goes wherever the wind blows, vote for or support JD Hayworth. It is our only chance.

http://www.jdforsenate.com/


47 posted on 04/24/2010 6:59:36 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Even here on FR when the trouble first started there were people who said we were exaggerating the problem

Yes, I remember when we were not allowed to post threads on border issues. Even when we were allowed to post about the problems, many did not believe what those of us on the border had to say~ because it wasn't reported by the media!

Now the media report some of what happens on the border but I think you have to live here to really know how bad it is. I am not sure why some don't grasp the issues when they are right out there in front of them. There are few areas in this country that have not been effected in a bad way by illegal immigration and smuggling of drugs and humans- yet it is not seen as the serious problem it really is.

48 posted on 04/24/2010 7:21:45 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Obama should dispatch National Guard troops to the border”

Does Obama/the federal government have charge over the National Guard? I thought that was the state’s governor’s duty.


49 posted on 04/24/2010 7:39:58 PM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; hampdenkid

“McCain defines hypocrisy.”

You can see that more people are on the same with John McCain on the ILLEGAL immigration issure:

“70% of Arizona Voters Favor New State Measure Cracking Down On Illegal Immigration”

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/arizona/70_of_arizona_voters_favor_new_state_measure_cracking_down_on_illegal_immigration


50 posted on 04/24/2010 7:52:24 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: democratsaremyenemy; Windflier; rabscuttle385; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker
Prior to January 11, 2010 the president needed the consent of state governors to appoint or deploy members or units of state National Guard as federally recognized armed force members in active or inactive service.[5][6][7] On that date President Obama signed Executive Order 13528 creating the Council of Governors removing the responsibility of the National Guard from the specific state governors to the Council appointed by the President.

Maybe this executive order doesn't mean what you think. This article doesn't say The "Council of Governors" ordered the guard to the border:

3/31/10 Richardson orders National Guard to the border

51 posted on 04/24/2010 8:17:00 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Maybe this executive order doesn't mean what you think. This article doesn't say The "Council of Governors" ordered the guard to the border...

I think you misunderstood what I was reacting to.

What I'm angry about is this:

"President Obama signed Executive Order 13528 creating the Council of Governors removing the responsibility of the National Guard from the specific state governors to the Council appointed by the President."

This Executive Order appears to have removed the National Guard from the authority of the 50 state Governors, and put it under the authority of a "Council" which is hand-picked by Obama.

52 posted on 04/24/2010 8:40:30 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

So how did Richardson order the guard to the border?

I have no doubt that Obama will grab power when he can, but this executive order did not prevent Richardson from sending the guard to the border. Maybe he let Richardson get away with taking commanding the guard by himself because he is a Dem.


53 posted on 04/24/2010 9:36:24 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
So how did Richardson order the guard to the border?

Is Bill Richardson an Obama appointee to the Council of Governors? I don't know. Did Obama give him a pass because he's part of the cabal? Again, I don't know.

Up is down, and down is up with this mis-administration. They're in full-scale treason against the Constitution and The People, so who can make sense of anything they do?

It's all treason as far as I'm concerned.

54 posted on 04/24/2010 10:02:27 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Maybe they don't have the COG set up yet?

It's all treason as far as I'm concerned.

I agree. If is were not for Obama's incompetence and greed, we would be in worse shape. The more blunders he makes, the better.

55 posted on 04/24/2010 11:00:48 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

““And that way, then the state of Arizona will not have to enact legislation which they have to do because of the federal government’s failure to carry out its responsibilities, which is to secure the borders.””

McCain is desperate to retain the 20 million already here


56 posted on 04/25/2010 5:12:33 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

” Speaking of Shamnesty... thy name is Juan.

Do you honestly believe this man would shill for votes? “

N O, not “the kid” uh uuuuuuuuuuh no way !


57 posted on 04/25/2010 5:15:57 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson