I believe this is the first I've heard of a US Official (even if unnamed) stating this...
1 posted on
04/26/2010 9:01:00 AM PDT by
jhpigott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; maquiladora; SunkenCiv; hennie pennie; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; ...
2 posted on
04/26/2010 9:02:27 AM PDT by
jhpigott
To: jhpigott
one free shot rule is in effect with Obama. Stern warning and finger wagging to follow. If it gets really bad, Obama-commie might even do a special one off teleprompter seance to make the NKs back down.
Got to be careful around other commies.
3 posted on
04/26/2010 9:05:18 AM PDT by
Tarpon
( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
To: jhpigott
Obama - what are you going to do?????
4 posted on
04/26/2010 9:08:10 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: jhpigott
SK could always conduct a covert counter war with the NorKs.
To: jhpigott
No more foreign movies for YOU, Mr. Dear Leader! That ought to show him we mean business!/s
To: jhpigott
Hmmm. I'm trying to figure out how this is not an act of war.
7 posted on
04/26/2010 9:10:47 AM PDT by
Oberon
(Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
To: jhpigott
If it is true.....so what? This administration won’t do a dam thing about it. When we look at S.Korea, Israel and other countries, this admin will turn on them.
8 posted on
04/26/2010 9:11:53 AM PDT by
RC2
To: jhpigott
I’m in favor of bombing Pyongyang into the Middle Ages and reunifying Korea under the South’s democratic government. It’s always a positive when communists are eradicated.
To: jhpigott
Where’s that Captain Obvious picture?
10 posted on
04/26/2010 9:12:53 AM PDT by
brothers4thID
(http://scarlettsays.blogspot.com/)
To: jhpigott
This calls for a strongly worded letter!
12 posted on
04/26/2010 9:15:36 AM PDT by
McGruff
(So how is that Hopey Changey thingy working out for ya America?)
To: jhpigott
>> Type EO-3G torpedo
Launched from what?
17 posted on
04/26/2010 9:31:41 AM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: jhpigott
18 posted on
04/26/2010 9:36:17 AM PDT by
ExTexasRedhead
(Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
To: jhpigott
Shhhh! I'm busy.
19 posted on
04/26/2010 9:49:33 AM PDT by
TSgt
(We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
To: jhpigott
22 posted on
04/26/2010 9:59:26 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: jhpigott
...but that the explosive device itself did not come in contact with the hull of the South Korean ship, the official said.Well, I'm no military genius but isn't that how a torpedo works...by coming in contact with the hull of a ship ????
23 posted on
04/26/2010 10:00:41 AM PDT by
Mopp4
To: jhpigott
KJ Ill will continue to up the ante, figuring that the more he provokes, the more likely U.S. taxpayer dollars will come his way.
30 posted on
04/26/2010 10:52:37 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: jhpigott
I think there is a agreement between NK, Iran, Syria Venezuela, etc to stir up trouble in concert.
36 posted on
04/26/2010 1:44:51 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: jhpigott
And by pretending there was any doubt and delaying the statement, they have given themselves an excuse to ignore direct military attack.
Inventive new cowardice, the new frontier in leftist political technique...
38 posted on
04/26/2010 2:53:43 PM PDT by
JasonC
To: jhpigott
I just looooove the title "U.S. official: N. Korea torpedo likely sunk S. Korean warship" Isn't it just a tad bit obvious?
To: jhpigott
Anybody think Kim would have pulled this under Dubya? Or any pub? Or even 90% of the rats? But under zero, hey, anything blows.
49 posted on
04/27/2010 12:16:09 AM PDT by
chilltherats
(First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson