He’s right on this one. Fascist might be more descriptive but it might appear more like name calling and be ignored more easily. But the definition given in the article for “corporatism” matches fascism to a ‘T’.
Maybe corporatism is to fascism as socialism is to communism...
Regardless, corporatism, fascism, socialism or communism...ultimately the end game is all the same and we all know how this story ends.
Someone really needs to sit Dr Paul down and explain this all to him. Corporatism is minor form of Fascism which is a form of Socialism which taken to it's ultimate extreme, turns into Communism.
They are all variations of the same thing.