Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

Wow
You are making a HUGE leap with your intimation.

BTW does this mean you don’t carry any ID with you?

sure


10 posted on 04/27/2010 1:10:53 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger

I’m an exercise walker and often the only thing I carry with me are keys and Kleenex.

This will change though,since my son,a police officer,said I should always carry ID in case of an accident.


13 posted on 04/27/2010 1:15:52 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: RWGinger
This means it shouldn't be a problem if I don't.

Thing is, to enforce a "members of group X _must_ have ID" pits the crime of some people not having their ID against indistinguishable behavior of the right of others to not have ID. This leads to the legislative solution of requiring EVERYONE to have ID, in which history will repeat by the practical consequence of the ID being the person (no ID = not a legal person), internal passports, control of movement & behavior, subjugation to government, and eventual culmination of an unpopular subgroup being oppressed if not wiped out entirely. I know that's a fast jump in a few words, but history bears out that's what happens.

Upshot: in a nation of free men, mere lack of ID shall not constitute a crime.

I understand the problem, and the desire for demanding ID. It's the wrong solution. The correct solution would be very unpopular in current sociopolitical climate.

16 posted on 04/27/2010 1:36:31 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson