Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is Ken Salazar hiding memo on new monuments, wilderness areas? (13M more acres)
Washington Examiner ^ | 4/28/2010 | Mark Tapscott

Posted on 04/28/2010 6:33:44 AM PDT by markomalley

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar was asked in a Feb. 26, 2010, letter from Western Caucus Chairman Rep. Rob Bishop, R-UT, and other representatives from western states for the missing pages from a leaked government memo that “contained detailed information about the administration’s plans to designate as many as 14 new national monuments and lock up as much as 13 million acres in states throughout the West.”

Bishop and his colleagues asked Salazar to provide the missing pages by March 26, or a month after their letter went to the Interior chief. More than two months later and Bishop has received exactly nothing from Salazar in response to the February 26 request.

Joining Bishop in making the request of Salazar were Rep. Doc Hastings, R-WA, the ranking GOP member of the House Natural Resources Committee, and 14 other members of the Western Caucus.

The congressmen have seven pages from the memo, including pages 15 – 21, which list the 14 potential new monuments and costs associated with the project, but the members have no way of knowing what else was in the memo or how many pages it totalled.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; landgrab; obamaregime; transparency
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
The memo in question is here: http://robbishop.house.gov/UploadedFiles/states_for_designation.pdf
1 posted on 04/28/2010 6:33:45 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Staircase Escalante all over again!!! More power grabs in a part of the country that is overwhelmingly under government control anyway.


2 posted on 04/28/2010 6:36:29 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Another land grab. Can these folks be imeached?


3 posted on 04/28/2010 6:36:35 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

good Lord, if these people take another inch out here of S. Utah, I swear, there could be an insurrection!

They haven’t recovered from the last one.


4 posted on 04/28/2010 6:40:37 AM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Very important read:

The Wrenching Transformation of America

www.augustreview.com/news_commentary/general/the_wrenching_transformation_of_america_20090422117/


5 posted on 04/28/2010 6:41:55 AM PDT by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; afraidfortherepublic; Don Corleone; Daisyjane69; Lorica; AuntB; SierraWasp; xcamel; ...

States should be taxxing the fed’s for the land they stole from the state!


6 posted on 04/28/2010 6:49:51 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Help Sarah Palin! go to - http://www.conservatives4palin.com - You know what to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

can they make him produce the docs?


7 posted on 04/28/2010 6:58:37 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The states should stop this. No more.


8 posted on 04/28/2010 7:18:39 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

No they can’t be imeached. However they serve at the president’s pleasure and only he can fire them. The president can be imeached with a majority of congress voting for it. Don’t think that is going to happen in the near future, do you?


9 posted on 04/28/2010 7:18:55 AM PDT by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz

No, and more’s the pity. It just shows how far this Congress and this nation has degenerated. THey won’t even ask for his authentic birth certificate.


10 posted on 04/28/2010 7:24:24 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

So how much percentage wise of land in the United States is “set aside” for this reason?

It would be interesting, I’ll bet it is past 10% if I had to guess..


11 posted on 04/28/2010 7:24:55 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Agenda 21.


12 posted on 04/28/2010 7:31:02 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

Whataya mean? Look how one state is currently being beat up for even the slightest, most feeble attempt at courage as in AZ demanding the United States of America allow that state to enforce FEDERAL law!!!


13 posted on 04/28/2010 7:40:28 AM PDT by SierraWasp ("Contempt of Congress" used to be a minor crime. Now it's a badge of honor!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

Someone needs to file a FOIA request.


14 posted on 04/28/2010 7:41:35 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
So how much percentage wise of land in the United States is “set aside” for this reason?

It would be interesting, I’ll bet it is past 10% if I had to guess..

More like 30% total. More per western state.

Stumbled across this site: Printable maps - Federal lands

15 posted on 04/28/2010 7:45:03 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Baynative

farming ping


17 posted on 04/28/2010 9:10:00 AM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John O

We should limit the fed to less than 10% of all totaly land in the US to be “owned” by the federal government.

They want to annex new land they have to get rid of the other land they hold first.


18 posted on 04/28/2010 9:33:52 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Forefathers would shoot us for letting the country slide this far. Can’t do it by ourselves. Glad to see America trying to wake up (TEA party). Fearful that post # 12 is closer than America is aware of....water is getting warm said the frog.


19 posted on 04/28/2010 9:59:12 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Help Sarah Palin! go to - http://www.conservatives4palin.com - You know what to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson