Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BP official blames failed equipment for Gulf oil spill
MarketWatch ^ | May 2, 2010, 4:04 p.m. EDT | Rex Crum, MarketWatch

Posted on 05/02/2010 10:12:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

U.S. shuts down commercial and recreational fishing from Louisiana to Florida

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The chairman of BP PLC's U.S. subsidiary on Sunday blamed failed equipment on a drilling rig for the oil-well blowout and subsequent huge leak into the Gulf of Mexico that now poses the threat of an unparalleled ecological disaster.

The leak, which began April 20, is threatening the Louisiana shoreline and experts say it could endanger the coast from Louisiana to Florida. Some experts say the leak, the Gulf Stream and the approaching hurricane season could combine to send a slick down Florida's Gulf Coast, around the tip of the state, up the Atlantic Coast and beyond.

The leak has become so extensive that U.S. officials on Sunday banned commercial and commercial and recreational fishing in areas from Louisiana to the Florida Panhandle.

BP America Inc. Chairman Lamar McKay, appearing on ABC's "This Week" program, said fail-safe mechanisms on the rig that were designed to prevent an oil spill had not worked as predicted and that a "failed piece of equipment" was to blame for the spill, according to the New York Times and other media outlets.

BP spokesman Bill Salvin said McKay was talking about the blowout preventer as the failed equipment that caused the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which killed 11 people. The blowout preventer typically activates after a blast or other event to cut off any oil that may spill.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: energy; gulf; leak; offshoredrilling; oil; oilrig; oilspill; uscg

1 posted on 05/02/2010 10:12:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER

fyi


2 posted on 05/02/2010 10:13:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I don’t know who supplied the BOP for BP, but China has become a major supplier of oil field equipment. They often steal the foreign designs. If the equipment did come from China..good..they have deep pockets to pay for the liability.


3 posted on 05/02/2010 10:25:28 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

China doesn’t design anything. They wait for others to do it and then steal it.


4 posted on 05/02/2010 10:31:21 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

You know this equipment worked last time their was a hurricane scare in the Gulf, because they have to evacuate the oil rigs and shut them down in case the derrick sinks and these valves have to work!!!!!


5 posted on 05/02/2010 10:49:47 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It is doubtful the shut off equipment could have withstood the explosion.

The additional fault lies with Janet Incompetana who stated she didn’t know the DOD had equipment that could have helped following the initial failure.


6 posted on 05/02/2010 10:56:56 PM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

Check the comments at the article....there was one down a bit in the stack...that seemed to talk about a particular sequence of commands that might have been incorrectly done.


7 posted on 05/02/2010 10:58:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“If it can be reactivated in the next few days the total volume of oil released by the Deepwater Horizon well will still be a fraction of the 30 million litres (6.5 million gallons) spilled in the Gulf after Hurricane Katrina.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7114487.ece

“ScienceDaily (Jan. 27, 2000) - Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year, according to a new study that will be presented January 27 at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Antonio, Texas

But the oil isn’t destroying habitats or wiping out ocean life. The ooze is a natural phenomena that’s been going on for many thousands of years, according to Roger Mitchell, Vice President of Program Development at the Earth Satellite Corporation (EarthSat) in Rockville Md. “The wildlife have adapted and evolved and have no problem dealing with the oil,” he said.”

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-40428


8 posted on 05/02/2010 11:14:41 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Ok...So I was wondering for anyone who might know. Why can’t they send down a huge vice grip type of device that is controlled by Hydraulics or an electric motor. They can use the ROV to position it around the pipe. Then they can just clamp it to shut off the flow by crushing the pipe.

Another way is to drop a huge and very heavy bowl on top of the well head with a pipe on top that is much larger than the well pipe and channel the oil and its pressure to the surface where tanker after tanker can line up to collect the oil. Use explosives to sever the pipe near the well head if necessary. Heck...maybe we can shut down the middle east oil business...LOL


9 posted on 05/03/2010 12:35:08 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

‘The additional fault lies with Janet Incompetana who stated she didn’t know the DOD had equipment that could have helped following the initial failure.’

BP should have been squared away. Now people want more Gov’t. Joy.


10 posted on 05/03/2010 12:47:20 AM PDT by Palter (Kilroy was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Why can’t they send down a huge vice grip type of device that is controlled by Hydraulics or an electric motor. They can use the ROV to position it around the pipe. Then they can just clamp it to shut off the flow by crushing the pipe.

The pipe is not strong enough to contain the oil. Informed people say that the pipe can hold something like 500 psi, but the oil is coming out at 3,500 psi... that's what I recall after reading a very detailed technical summary.

With regard to your other proposal, I read that they are going to do that.

11 posted on 05/03/2010 12:53:30 AM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

The BOP in question came from Cameron Inernational here in Houston -

Of course the BOP “failure to operate” did not “Cause” the event -

....more likely it was a failure of the well casing cement that had just been placed (properly or improperly??) my the dreaded and evil Halliburton (Dick Cheney)


12 posted on 05/03/2010 3:59:02 AM PDT by VRWCTexan (uestion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The cause of the blast remains undetermined, and Salvin said, “We’re not ruling anything out.”

Why equipment failed, how they will cap it, etc. are priority focus right now.

The not having the cause of the blast...is worrisome.
The focus on equipment failures and very little discussion as to the cause of the blast is being glossed over by the media, why?

Right now it appears as a blast strong enough to cause equipment failure.

Either this was a very unique set of accident circumstances or it was a very well planned act of sabotage. Experience has taught me several things regarding the really bad accidents. Either the business is really, really sloppy or there is some other motivating factor.

The cause of the blast remains undetermined, and Salvin said, “We’re not ruling anything out.”


13 posted on 05/03/2010 4:21:47 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

BOP and Storm Choke not the same.


14 posted on 05/03/2010 6:51:18 AM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

The Hurricane was a surface disturbance...


15 posted on 05/03/2010 8:13:54 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou

i know it is not the same but they have to shut the valves in case of Hurricane failure of derrick?


16 posted on 05/03/2010 11:47:42 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

When I worked in that same area offshore, we would set storm chokes inside the production pipe to shut-off during a storm incase something like a barge knocks into or over the production platform.


17 posted on 05/03/2010 12:13:30 PM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou

stands to reason, is that the same shutoff valve at the sea floor?


18 posted on 05/03/2010 9:05:46 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson