Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jiggyboy

You got it wrong. Since when does a conservative advocate doing away with local control. You might not like what your local city council via its redevelopment agency is doing, but at least at the local level you have a fighting chance to correct the situation.

This take from the cities simply puts more money in Sacramento’s hands to spend - unless you think they will use it responsibly to reduce the deficit?

You are corect that a side benefit will be to reduce the amount of money that cities are required to spend on low income housing using redevelopment agency funds. The smart cities will use these funds to send to the state.

In case you are not aware, that low income housing is a state requirement imposed on cities out of Sacramento.


8 posted on 05/04/2010 11:56:29 AM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: gunsequalfreedom

A lot of money or redevelopment was raised by bonds. Be warned those will be the first to default if cities go broke(they are now).


9 posted on 05/04/2010 12:01:47 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson