Skip to comments.What If George W. Bush Had Called Gay Rights Activists 'Faggots?'
Posted on 05/05/2010 2:29:06 PM PDT by Nachum
Editor's Note: NewsBusters Publisher and Media Research Center President President Brent Bozell released the following statement today regarding the broadcast and cable news media's silence about President Barack Obama's use of a crass sexual slang term to refer to Tea Party members.
If President George W. Bush had slurred the gay-rights movement during his presidency, it would have immediately dominated the news of every single national media outlet. Reporters would have pummeled the Administration and demanded an explanation and apology for the offense, and rightly so. You dont smear anyone let alone fellow Americans who elected you to office regardless of your political differences.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
They would have got a tingly feeling in their leg.....
Then maybe I would have voted for him.
“What If George W. Bush Had Called Gay Rights Activists ‘Faggots?’”
Heck you don’t even have to go that far. What if George W called gay rights activists “Teabaggers”?
I don’t get it?
I heard him call Eaker a faggot once.
The Lavender Mafia is in a tizzy today about a Christian “leader” nobody ever heard of having a “rentboy”.
Barney Frank had a rent boy executive at Fannie Mae and they didn’t care.
Larry Sinclair alleged a crack fueled sexual escapade with Barack Obama and they didn’t blink.
We deserve to know which anchors are homosexuals. Why is “don’t ask don’t tell” just bad policy for the military? Why must journalists remain in the closet? The public deserves to know why they spin these issues.
They also used the term “chickenhawks” when patriots rallied to support the troops in Iraq.
Chickenhawk is a term used to describe an older man who cruises boys for sex.
In the interest of brevity, which ones aren't?
Barbara Wawa is just a adulteress who may have slept her way to the top...
I would do the same if I were a women. No sense having to climb that ladder.
Call me slutty.
Well you can’t expect the media to condemn obama calling us Tea Baggers when it was one of their esteemed bretheren who first used the term to describe us. Since then it has become part of their common lexicon. And since so many of them enjoy the activity the term implies they can’t understand why anyone would object to their use of said term.
wait.... did this happen?
Did obambi drop the gay f-bomb?
“Tea Bagger” is a gay sexual slur.
The Left is Vile and Evil and exists to denigrate all that is Good and Just.
If a “TEA Party” member can be maligned, they’ll do it.
If a Priest can be maligned, they’ll do it.
If an unborn baby can be maligned, they’ll do it.
If a disabled person can be maligned, they’ll do it.
If a non-RINO Republican can be maligned, they’ll do it.
Philippians 4: 8Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirableif anything is excellent or praiseworthythink about such things.
Maybe a TEA Party member could put this on a poster to glaringly reflect what is good to those who are not.
More aptly, if he had called leftist protesters in general “cornholers”, “buggerers” or something describing a gay sexual act, as Obama and the leftists do with conservatives, he would be vilified to this day.
He would have gotten more votes.
He called Clymer a clymer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.