To: rockhardo
I have no problem with her favoring a different candidate than the Tea partiers, but to characterize their choice as a “purge” is beyond stupid. People have a right to vote for candidates they prefer. It’s not a purge, it’s an election.
27 posted on
05/06/2010 6:06:50 AM PDT by
Hacklehead
(Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
To: Hacklehead
Don’t you love their “verbal virtuousity”?
They use loaded words against conservatives, true Americans,
and then refuse to use words that actually mean things when describing Islamic terrorist attacks.
33 posted on
05/06/2010 6:17:43 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Hacklehead
I have no problem with her favoring a different candidate than the Tea partiers, but to characterize their choice as a “purge” is beyond stupid. People have a right to vote for candidates they prefer. It’s not a purge, it’s an election. It's the MSM carefully chosing which word to use. For example, in 1994 the Republicans "Took Over" Congress. They didn't win, they weren't elected, they weren't chosen by the people. Nope, they "took over" like some banana republic junta which would soon be removed by the legitimate government (i.e. the Democrats).
47 posted on
05/06/2010 8:36:47 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(I am so immune to satire that I ate three Irish children after reading Swift's "A Modest Proposal")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson