Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: massmike

Junk science. The banning of aerosol propellants worked for the south pole but they can’t figure out the north pole problem. If that isn’t the classic case of a casual (not causal) relationship, I never heard one.


11 posted on 05/07/2010 4:53:14 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: anton
Junk science. The banning of aerosol propellants worked for the south pole but they can’t figure out the north pole problem. If that isn’t the classic case of a casual (not causal) relationship, I never heard one.

All the "ozone depleting chemicals" were heavier then air. How did they get up all those miles to perform this chemical process? Answer: It was about destroying an existing market AFTER having setup its replacement quietly in the background, to be forced by new laws. Just like what's happening today.

20 posted on 05/07/2010 5:07:09 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: anton
I have asked several “scientists” that are ozone hole shriekers how the CFC’s know to go South and find the area over the pole. None has even attempted an answer other than “it is a mechanism we do not understand and it needs more study”. Yea right.
31 posted on 05/07/2010 5:23:48 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (If you can read this you are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson